[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v13] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Including DRRS test coverage
Ramalingam C
ramalingam.c at intel.com
Thu Jan 11 05:27:52 UTC 2018
On Wednesday 10 January 2018 11:45 PM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 02:47:00PM +0000, Lohith BS wrote:
>> Dynamic Refresh Rate Switch(DRRS) is used to switch the panel's
>> refresh rate to the lowest vrefresh supported by panel, when frame is
>> not flipped for more than a Sec.
>>
>> In kernel, DRRS uses the front buffer tracking infrastructure.
>> Hence DRRS test coverage is added along with other frontbuffer tracking
>> based features such as FBC and PSR tests.
>>
>> Here, we are testing DRRS with other features in all possible
>> combinations, in all required test cases, to capture any possible
>> regression.
>>
>> v2: Addressed the comments and suggestions from Vlad, Marius.
>> The signoff details from the earlier work are also included.
>>
>> v3: Modified vblank rate calculation by using reply-sequence,
>> provided by drmWaitVBlank, as suggested by Chris Wilson.
>>
>> v4: As suggested from Chris Wilson and Daniel Vetter
>> 1) Avoided using pthread for calculating vblank refresh rate,
>> instead used drmWaitVBlank reply sequence.
>> 2) Avoided using kernel-specific info like transitional delays,
>> instead polling mechanism with timeout is used.
>> 3) Included edp-DRRS as a subtest in kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c,
>> instead of having a separate test.
>>
>> v5: This patch adds DRRS as a new feature in the
>> kms_frontbuffer_tracking IGT.
>> DRRS switch to lower vrefresh rate is tested at slow-draw subtest.
>>
>> Note:
>> 1) Currently kernel doesn't have support to enable and disable
>> the DRRS feature dynamically(as in case of PSR). Hence if the
>> panel supports DRRS it will be enabled by default.
>>
>> This is in continuation of last patch
>> "https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/162726/"
>>
>> v6: This patch adds runtime enable and disable feature for testing DRRS
>>
>> v7: This patch adds runtime enable and disable feature for testing DRRS
>> through debugfs entry "i915_drrs_ctl".
>>
>> v8: Commit message is updated to reflect current implementation.
>>
>> v9: Addressed Paulo Zanoni comments.
>> Check for DRRS_LOW at tests with OFFSCREEN + FBS_INDIVIDUAL.
>>
>> v10: Corrected DRRS state expectation in suspend related subtests.
>>
>> v11: Removing the global flag is_psr_drrs_combo [Rodrigo].
>>
>> v12: Rewriting the DRRS inactive deduction [Rodrigo].
>>
>> v13: En/Dis-able DRRS only when DRRS is capable on the setup.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lohith BS <lohith.bs at intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: aknautiy <ankit.k.nautiyal at intel.com>
>> ---
>> tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c | 172 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 164 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c b/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
>> index 1601cab..6b2299b 100644
>> --- a/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
>> +++ b/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
>> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
>>
>>
>> IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test the Kernel's frontbuffer tracking mechanism and "
>> - "its related features: FBC and PSR");
>> + "its related features: FBC, PSR and DRRS");
>>
>> /*
>> * One of the aspects of this test is that, for every subtest, we try different
>> @@ -105,8 +105,9 @@ struct test_mode {
>> FEATURE_NONE = 0,
>> FEATURE_FBC = 1,
>> FEATURE_PSR = 2,
>> - FEATURE_COUNT = 4,
>> - FEATURE_DEFAULT = 4,
>> + FEATURE_DRRS = 4,
>> + FEATURE_COUNT = 8,
>> + FEATURE_DEFAULT = 8,
>> } feature;
>>
>> /* Possible pixel formats. We just use FORMAT_DEFAULT for most tests and
>> @@ -182,6 +183,13 @@ struct {
>> .can_test = false,
>> };
>>
>> +#define MAX_DRRS_STATUS_BUF_LEN 256
>> +
>> +struct {
>> + bool can_test;
>> +} drrs = {
>> + .can_test = false,
>> +};
>>
>> #define SINK_CRC_SIZE 12
>> typedef struct {
>> @@ -790,7 +798,14 @@ static void __debugfs_read(const char *param, char *buf, int len)
>> buf[len] = '\0';
>> }
>>
>> +static void __debugfs_write(const char *param, char *buf, int len)
>> +{
>> + igt_assert_eq(igt_sysfs_write(drm.debugfs, param, buf, len - 1),
>> + len - 1);
>> +}
>> +
>> #define debugfs_read(p, arr) __debugfs_read(p, arr, sizeof(arr))
>> +#define debugfs_write(p, arr) __debugfs_write(p, arr, sizeof(arr))
>>
>> static bool fbc_is_enabled(void)
>> {
>> @@ -825,6 +840,62 @@ static void psr_print_status(void)
>> igt_info("PSR status:\n%s\n", buf);
>> }
>>
>> +void drrs_set(unsigned int val)
>> +{
>> + char buf[2];
>> +
>> + if (!drrs.can_test)
>> + return;
> Can you please elaborate more about this solution here?
>
> I couldn't find the logs anymore. What was the issue that CI caught?
CI failure were caused due to two reasons:
* Error from kernel on debugfs write when the platform doesn't support
DRRS (<gen7).
This can be addressed either from kernel by returning
success from i915_drrs_ctl_set instead of -ENODEV for <gen7,
or by not En/Disable the drrs feature when you already knew
that feature is not supported.
* Non Availability of debugfs_fd for debugfs write for DRRS when eDP
panel was not there.
This is handled by adding debugfs_write. Which will open
and close the file as and when it is required using igt_sysfs_write.
Similar to already existing debugfs_read.
>
> What happens if a regular user on HSW with no DRRS monitor (same configuration as CI)
> write to this debugfs enabling DRRS?
Basically this debugfs writein kernel
on >=gen7
for drrs enable req: will enable drrs if there is any DRRS
capable eDP panel.
for drrs disable req: will disable drrs if there is any
DRRS capable eDP panel in enabled state.
on <gen7
returns -ENODEV. Not sure whether we should just skip all
operations and return success on <gen7 also.
This patch skips any write into the drrs ctrl debugfs.
>
> What I wonder is if this is the right place for this solution or on the
> kernel side.
>
> Also if it is a testcase I wonder if it shouldn't have a skip handling
> somewhere instead of a blind return....
In this IGT before every subtest, all the features are disabled and only
the features required for that subtest is enabled.
So we though its good to validate the en/Disable call at the
implementation of drrs_set than at calling place. Please suggest if you
think otherway.
-Ram
>
> Thanks,
> Rodrigo.
>
>> +
>> + igt_debug("Manually %sabling DRRS. %llu\n", val ? "en" : "dis", val);
>> + snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%d", val);
>> + debugfs_write("i915_drrs_ctl", buf);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool is_drrs_high(void)
>> +{
>> + char buf[MAX_DRRS_STATUS_BUF_LEN];
>> +
>> + debugfs_read("i915_drrs_status", buf);
>> + return strstr(buf, "DRRS_HIGH_RR");
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool is_drrs_low(void)
>> +{
>> + char buf[MAX_DRRS_STATUS_BUF_LEN];
>> +
>> + debugfs_read("i915_drrs_status", buf);
>> + return strstr(buf, "DRRS_LOW_RR");
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool is_drrs_supported(void)
>> +{
>> + char buf[MAX_DRRS_STATUS_BUF_LEN];
>> +
>> + debugfs_read("i915_drrs_status", buf);
>> + return strstr(buf, "DRRS Supported: Yes");
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool is_drrs_inactive(void)
>> +{
>> + char buf[MAX_DRRS_STATUS_BUF_LEN];
>> +
>> + debugfs_read("i915_drrs_status", buf);
>> +
>> + if (strstr(buf, "DRRS_State: "))
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void drrs_print_status(void)
>> +{
>> + char buf[MAX_DRRS_STATUS_BUF_LEN];
>> +
>> + debugfs_read("i915_drrs_status", buf);
>> + igt_info("DRRS STATUS :\n%s\n", buf);
>> +}
>> +
>> static struct timespec fbc_get_last_action(void)
>> {
>> struct timespec ret = { 0, 0 };
>> @@ -935,10 +1006,17 @@ static bool psr_wait_until_enabled(void)
>> return igt_wait(psr_is_enabled(), 5000, 1);
>> }
>>
>> +static bool drrs_wait_until_rr_switch_to_low(void)
>> +{
>> + return igt_wait(is_drrs_low(), 5000, 1);
>> +}
>> +
>> #define fbc_enable() igt_set_module_param_int("enable_fbc", 1)
>> #define fbc_disable() igt_set_module_param_int("enable_fbc", 0)
>> #define psr_enable() igt_set_module_param_int("enable_psr", 1)
>> #define psr_disable() igt_set_module_param_int("enable_psr", 0)
>> +#define drrs_enable() drrs_set(1)
>> +#define drrs_disable() drrs_set(0)
>>
>> static void get_sink_crc(sink_crc_t *crc, bool mandatory)
>> {
>> @@ -1184,6 +1262,7 @@ static void disable_features(const struct test_mode *t)
>>
>> fbc_disable();
>> psr_disable();
>> + drrs_disable();
>> }
>>
>> static void *busy_thread_func(void *data)
>> @@ -1577,6 +1656,22 @@ static void teardown_psr(void)
>> {
>> }
>>
>> +static void setup_drrs(void)
>> +{
>> + if (get_connector(prim_mode_params.connector_id)->connector_type !=
>> + DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP) {
>> + igt_info("Can't test DRRS: no usable eDP screen.\n");
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!is_drrs_supported()) {
>> + igt_info("Can't test DRRS: Not supported.\n");
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + drrs.can_test = true;
>> +}
>> +
>> static void setup_environment(void)
>> {
>> setup_drm();
>> @@ -1584,6 +1679,7 @@ static void setup_environment(void)
>>
>> setup_fbc();
>> setup_psr();
>> + setup_drrs();
>>
>> setup_crcs();
>> }
>> @@ -1662,6 +1758,11 @@ static void do_flush(const struct test_mode *t)
>> #define ASSERT_PSR_ENABLED (1 << 6)
>> #define ASSERT_PSR_DISABLED (1 << 7)
>>
>> +#define DRRS_ASSERT_FLAGS (7 << 8)
>> +#define ASSERT_DRRS_HIGH (1 << 8)
>> +#define ASSERT_DRRS_LOW (1 << 9)
>> +#define ASSERT_DRRS_INACTIVE (1 << 10)
>> +
>> static int adjust_assertion_flags(const struct test_mode *t, int flags)
>> {
>> if (!(flags & DONT_ASSERT_FEATURE_STATUS)) {
>> @@ -1669,12 +1770,17 @@ static int adjust_assertion_flags(const struct test_mode *t, int flags)
>> flags |= ASSERT_FBC_ENABLED;
>> if (!(flags & ASSERT_PSR_DISABLED))
>> flags |= ASSERT_PSR_ENABLED;
>> + if (!((flags & ASSERT_DRRS_LOW) ||
>> + (flags & ASSERT_DRRS_INACTIVE)))
>> + flags |= ASSERT_DRRS_HIGH;
>> }
>>
>> if ((t->feature & FEATURE_FBC) == 0)
>> flags &= ~FBC_ASSERT_FLAGS;
>> if ((t->feature & FEATURE_PSR) == 0)
>> flags &= ~PSR_ASSERT_FLAGS;
>> + if ((t->feature & FEATURE_DRRS) == 0)
>> + flags &= ~DRRS_ASSERT_FLAGS;
>>
>> return flags;
>> }
>> @@ -1706,6 +1812,23 @@ static void do_status_assertions(int flags)
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> + if (flags & ASSERT_DRRS_HIGH) {
>> + if (!is_drrs_high()) {
>> + drrs_print_status();
>> + igt_assert_f(false, "DRRS HIGH\n");
>> + }
>> + } else if (flags & ASSERT_DRRS_LOW) {
>> + if (!drrs_wait_until_rr_switch_to_low()) {
>> + drrs_print_status();
>> + igt_assert_f(false, "DRRS LOW\n");
>> + }
>> + } else if (flags & ASSERT_DRRS_INACTIVE) {
>> + if (!is_drrs_inactive()) {
>> + drrs_print_status();
>> + igt_assert_f(false, "DRRS INACTIVE\n");
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> if (flags & ASSERT_FBC_ENABLED) {
>> igt_require(!fbc_not_enough_stolen());
>> igt_require(!fbc_stride_not_supported());
>> @@ -1833,6 +1956,8 @@ static void enable_features_for_test(const struct test_mode *t)
>> fbc_enable();
>> if (t->feature & FEATURE_PSR)
>> psr_enable();
>> + if (t->feature & FEATURE_DRRS)
>> + drrs_enable();
>> }
>>
>> static void check_test_requirements(const struct test_mode *t)
>> @@ -1852,6 +1977,18 @@ static void check_test_requirements(const struct test_mode *t)
>> "Can't test PSR without sink CRCs\n");
>> }
>>
>> + if (t->feature & FEATURE_DRRS)
>> + igt_require_f(drrs.can_test,
>> + "Can't test DRRS with the current outputs\n");
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * In kernel, When PSR is enabled, DRRS will be disabled. So If a test
>> + * case needs DRRS + PSR enabled, that will be skipped.
>> + */
>> + igt_require_f(!((t->feature & FEATURE_PSR) &&
>> + (t->feature & FEATURE_DRRS)),
>> + "Can't test PSR and DRRS together\n");
>> +
>> if (opt.only_pipes != PIPE_COUNT)
>> igt_require(t->pipes == opt.only_pipes);
>> }
>> @@ -1973,7 +2110,7 @@ static void rte_subtest(const struct test_mode *t)
>>
>> unset_all_crtcs();
>> do_assertions(ASSERT_FBC_DISABLED | ASSERT_PSR_DISABLED |
>> - DONT_ASSERT_CRC);
>> + DONT_ASSERT_CRC | ASSERT_DRRS_INACTIVE);
>>
>> enable_prim_screen_and_wait(t);
>> set_cursor_for_test(t, &prim_mode_params);
>> @@ -2065,6 +2202,13 @@ static void draw_subtest(const struct test_mode *t)
>> if (op_disables_psr(t, t->method))
>> assertions |= ASSERT_PSR_DISABLED;
>>
>> + /*
>> + * On FBS_INDIVIDUAL, write to offscreen plane will not touch the
>> + * current frambuffer. Hence assert for DRRS_LOW.
>> + */
>> + if ((t->fbs == FBS_INDIVIDUAL) && (t->screen == SCREEN_OFFSCREEN))
>> + assertions |= ASSERT_DRRS_LOW;
>> +
>> prepare_subtest(t, pattern);
>> target = pick_target(t, params);
>>
>> @@ -2273,7 +2417,11 @@ static void slow_draw_subtest(const struct test_mode *t)
>> sleep(2);
>>
>> update_wanted_crc(t, &pattern->crcs[t->format][r]);
>> - do_assertions(0);
>> +
>> + if (t->feature & FEATURE_DRRS)
>> + do_assertions(ASSERT_DRRS_LOW);
>> + else
>> + do_assertions(0);
>> }
>> }
>>
>> @@ -2882,14 +3030,14 @@ static void suspend_subtest(const struct test_mode *t)
>> sleep(5);
>> igt_system_suspend_autoresume(SUSPEND_STATE_MEM, SUSPEND_TEST_NONE);
>> sleep(5);
>> - do_assertions(0);
>> + do_assertions(ASSERT_DRRS_LOW);
>>
>> unset_all_crtcs();
>> sleep(5);
>> igt_system_suspend_autoresume(SUSPEND_STATE_MEM, SUSPEND_TEST_NONE);
>> sleep(5);
>> do_assertions(ASSERT_FBC_DISABLED | ASSERT_PSR_DISABLED |
>> - DONT_ASSERT_CRC);
>> + DONT_ASSERT_CRC | ASSERT_DRRS_INACTIVE);
>>
>> set_mode_for_params(params);
>> do_assertions(0);
>> @@ -3371,6 +3519,14 @@ static const char *feature_str(int feature)
>> return "psr";
>> case FEATURE_FBC | FEATURE_PSR:
>> return "fbcpsr";
>> + case FEATURE_DRRS:
>> + return "drrs";
>> + case FEATURE_FBC | FEATURE_DRRS:
>> + return "fbcdrrs";
>> + case FEATURE_PSR | FEATURE_DRRS:
>> + return "psrdrrs";
>> + case FEATURE_FBC | FEATURE_PSR | FEATURE_DRRS:
>> + return "fbcpsrdrrs";
>> default:
>> igt_assert(false);
>> }
>> @@ -3635,7 +3791,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>> tilingchange_subtest(&t);
>> }
>>
>> - if (t.feature & FEATURE_PSR)
>> + if ((t.feature & FEATURE_PSR) || (t.feature & FEATURE_DRRS))
>> igt_subtest_f("%s-slowdraw", feature_str(t.feature))
>> slow_draw_subtest(&t);
>>
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20180111/eacce24e/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list