[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 4/6] drm/i915: add rcs topology to error state

Lionel Landwerlin lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com
Fri Jan 12 23:45:30 UTC 2018


On 12/01/18 18:22, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jan 2018 17:00:34 +0100, Lionel Landwerlin 
> <lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com> wrote:
>
>> This might be useful information for developers looking at an error
>> state.
>>
>> v2: Place topology towards the end of the error state (Chris)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 40 
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
>> index 944059322daa..cc7f53cc9a77 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
>> @@ -605,6 +605,45 @@ static void err_print_uc(struct 
>> drm_i915_error_state_buf *m,
>>      print_error_obj(m, NULL, "GuC log buffer", error_uc->guc_log);
>>  }
>> +static void err_print_rcs_topology(struct drm_i915_error_state_buf *m,
>> +                   const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu)
>
> As this function is similar to i915_rcs_topology from patch 3/6
> maybe you should consider defining single function that will be
> based on drm_printer mechanism (like already done in few places)
>
> Michal

Thanks, will do.

>
>> +{
>> +    int s, ss;
>> +    int subslice_stride =
>> +        DIV_ROUND_UP(sseu->max_eus_per_subslice, BITS_PER_BYTE);
>> +
>> +    /* Unavailable prior to Gen 8. */
>> +    if (sseu->max_slices == 0)
>> +        return;
>> +
>> +    err_printf(m, "RCS topology:\n");
>> +
>> +    for (s = 0; s < sseu->max_slices; s++) {
>> +        err_printf(m, "  slice%i %u subslice(s) (0x%hhx):\n",
>> +               s, hweight8(sseu->subslice_mask[s]),
>> +               sseu->subslice_mask[s]);
>> +
>> +        for (ss = 0; ss < sseu->max_subslices; ss++) {
>> +            int eu_group, n_subslice_eus = 0;
>> +
>> +            for (eu_group = 0; eu_group < subslice_stride; 
>> eu_group++) {
>> +                n_subslice_eus +=
>> +                    hweight8(sseu_eu_mask(sseu, s, ss, eu_group));
>> +            }
>> +
>> +            err_printf(m, "    subslice%i: %u EUs (", ss, 
>> n_subslice_eus);
>> +            for (eu_group = 0;
>> +                 eu_group < max(0, subslice_stride - 1);
>> +                 eu_group++) {
>> +                u8 val = sseu_eu_mask(sseu, s, ss, eu_group);
>> +                err_printf(m, " 0x%hhx", val);
>> +            }
>> +            err_printf(m, "0x%hhx)\n",
>> +                   sseu_eu_mask(sseu, s, ss, subslice_stride - 1));
>> +        }
>> +    }
>> +}
>> +
>>  int i915_error_state_to_str(struct drm_i915_error_state_buf *m,
>>                  const struct i915_gpu_state *error)
>>  {
>> @@ -787,6 +826,7 @@ int i915_error_state_to_str(struct 
>> drm_i915_error_state_buf *m,
>>          intel_display_print_error_state(m, error->display);
>>     err_print_capabilities(m, &error->device_info);
>> +    err_print_rcs_topology(m, &INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->sseu);
>>      err_print_params(m, &error->params);
>>      err_print_uc(m, &error->uc);
>



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list