[Intel-gfx] Prevent trivial oom from gem_exec_nop/sequential

Chris Wilson chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Mon Jan 15 21:24:45 UTC 2018

Previous message (by thread): [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Rewrite some comments around RCU-deferred object free
Next message (by thread): [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915: Only attempt to scan the requested number of shrinker slabs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

About the third resend of this series that tries to curtail the prolonged
reference lifetimes of fences via the signaler thread when the CPUs are
saturated by interrupts.
-Chris

Previous message (by thread): [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Rewrite some comments around RCU-deferred object free
Next message (by thread): [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915: Only attempt to scan the requested number of shrinker slabs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list