[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915: Fix DPLCLKA_CFGCR0 bits for Port F.
Rodrigo Vivi
rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Mon Jan 22 23:08:03 UTC 2018
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 09:44:47PM +0000, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-01-19 at 16:05 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > Since when it got introduced with commit '555e38d27317
> > ("drm/i915/cnl: DDI - PLL mapping")' the support for Port F
> > was wrong, because Port F bits are far from bits used
> > for A to E.
> >
> > Since Port F is not used so far we don't need to propagate
> > Fixes back there.
> >
> > v2: Reuse _SHIFT definition to avoid complicated duplication (DK).
> >
> > Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com>
> > Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
> > Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 10 ++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > index 3ad9ad4a7918..861a7d5a27af 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > @@ -8838,10 +8838,12 @@ enum skl_power_gate {
> > * CNL Clocks
> > */
> > #define DPCLKA_CFGCR0 _MMIO(0x6C200)
> > -#define DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_OFF(port) (1 << ((port)+10))
> > -#define DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_MASK(port) (3 << ((port)*2))
> > -#define DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_SHIFT(port) ((port)*2)
> > -#define DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL(pll, port) ((pll) << ((port)*2))
> > +#define DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_OFF(port) (1 << ((port) == PORT_F ? 23 : \
> > + (port)+10))
> > +#define DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_SHIFT(port) ((port) == PORT_F ? 21 : \
> > + (port)*2)
>
> nit: I wouldn't bother with the new line, more readable without it. And
> there seems to be plenty of places in that file where the 80 char limit
> is exceeded.
well, it depends on the screen size. If not cut the screen size will limit that
and in my current case it gets worse...
>
>
> Either way, patch looks correct.
> Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com>
Thanks,
Rodrigo.
>
>
> > +#define DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_MASK(port) (3 << DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_SHIFT(port))
> > +#define DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL(pll, port) ((pll) << DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_SHIFT(port))
> >
> > /* CNL PLL */
> > #define DPLL0_ENABLE 0x46010
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list