[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/17] drm/i915/icl: Do not fix dbuf block size to 512

James Ausmus james.ausmus at intel.com
Wed Jan 24 01:14:43 UTC 2018


On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 05:05:25PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> From: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar at intel.com>
> 
> GEN9/10 had fixed DBuf block size of 512. Dbuf block size is not a
> fixed number anymore in GEN11, it varies according to bits per pixel
> and tiling. If 8bpp & Yf-tile surface, block size = 256 else block
> size = 512
> 
> This patch addresses the same.
> 
> v2 (from Paulo):
>   - Make it compile.
>   - Fix a few coding style issues.
> v3
>   - Rebase on top of upstream patches
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 8333692dac5a..cc5ac327f267 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -1460,6 +1460,7 @@ struct skl_wm_params {
>  	uint_fixed_16_16_t plane_blocks_per_line;
>  	uint_fixed_16_16_t y_tile_minimum;
>  	uint32_t linetime_us;
> +	uint32_t dbuf_block_size;
>  };
>  
>  /*
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 11aac65d1543..44d952a3d9a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -4312,7 +4312,7 @@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
>  */
>  static uint_fixed_16_16_t
>  skl_wm_method1(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, uint32_t pixel_rate,
> -	       uint8_t cpp, uint32_t latency)
> +	       uint8_t cpp, uint32_t latency, uint32_t dbuf_block_size)
>  {
>  	uint32_t wm_intermediate_val;
>  	uint_fixed_16_16_t ret;
> @@ -4321,7 +4321,7 @@ skl_wm_method1(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, uint32_t pixel_rate,
>  		return FP_16_16_MAX;
>  
>  	wm_intermediate_val = latency * pixel_rate * cpp;
> -	ret = div_fixed16(wm_intermediate_val, 1000 * 512);
> +	ret = div_fixed16(wm_intermediate_val, 1000 * dbuf_block_size);
>  
>  	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10)
>  		ret = add_fixed16_u32(ret, 1);
> @@ -4431,6 +4431,15 @@ skl_compute_plane_wm_params(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	wp->plane_pixel_rate = skl_adjusted_plane_pixel_rate(cstate,
>  							     intel_pstate);
>  
> +	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11) {
> +		if (fb->modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED && wp->cpp == 8)
> +			wp->dbuf_block_size = 256;
> +		else
> +			wp->dbuf_block_size = 512;
> +	} else {
> +		wp->dbuf_block_size = 512;
> +	}

This could be simplified as (approximately)

wp->dbuf_block_size = 512;
if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11 && fb->modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED &&
    wp->cpp == 8)
	wp->dbuf_block_size = 256;


> +
>  	if (drm_rotation_90_or_270(pstate->rotation)) {
>  
>  		switch (wp->cpp) {
> @@ -4457,7 +4466,8 @@ skl_compute_plane_wm_params(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	wp->plane_bytes_per_line = wp->width * wp->cpp;
>  	if (wp->y_tiled) {
>  		interm_pbpl = DIV_ROUND_UP(wp->plane_bytes_per_line *
> -					   wp->y_min_scanlines, 512);
> +					   wp->y_min_scanlines,
> +					   wp->dbuf_block_size);
>  
>  		if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10)
>  			interm_pbpl++;
> @@ -4465,10 +4475,12 @@ skl_compute_plane_wm_params(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  		wp->plane_blocks_per_line = div_fixed16(interm_pbpl,
>  							wp->y_min_scanlines);
>  	} else if (wp->x_tiled && IS_GEN9(dev_priv)) {
> -		interm_pbpl = DIV_ROUND_UP(wp->plane_bytes_per_line, 512);
> +		interm_pbpl = DIV_ROUND_UP(wp->plane_bytes_per_line,
> +					   wp->dbuf_block_size);
>  		wp->plane_blocks_per_line = u32_to_fixed16(interm_pbpl);
>  	} else {
> -		interm_pbpl = DIV_ROUND_UP(wp->plane_bytes_per_line, 512) + 1;
> +		interm_pbpl = DIV_ROUND_UP(wp->plane_bytes_per_line,
> +					   wp->dbuf_block_size) + 1;
>  		wp->plane_blocks_per_line = u32_to_fixed16(interm_pbpl);
>  	}
>  
> @@ -4515,7 +4527,7 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  		latency += 15;
>  
>  	method1 = skl_wm_method1(dev_priv, wp->plane_pixel_rate,
> -				 wp->cpp, latency);
> +				 wp->cpp, latency, wp->dbuf_block_size);
>  	method2 = skl_wm_method2(wp->plane_pixel_rate,
>  				 cstate->base.adjusted_mode.crtc_htotal,
>  				 latency,
> @@ -4525,7 +4537,8 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  		selected_result = max_fixed16(method2, wp->y_tile_minimum);
>  	} else {
>  		if ((wp->cpp * cstate->base.adjusted_mode.crtc_htotal /
> -		     512 < 1) && (wp->plane_bytes_per_line / 512 < 1))
> +		     wp->dbuf_block_size < 1) &&
> +		     (wp->plane_bytes_per_line / wp->dbuf_block_size < 1))
>  			selected_result = method2;
>  		else if (ddb_allocation >=
>  			 fixed16_to_u32_round_up(wp->plane_blocks_per_line))
> -- 
> 2.14.3
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list