[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Move LRC register offsets to a header file

Jani Nikula jani.nikula at linux.intel.com
Wed Jan 24 10:13:31 UTC 2018


On Tue, 23 Jan 2018, Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> Quoting Lucas De Marchi (2018-01-23 16:06:16)
>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 08:48:01AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
>> > Quoting Michel Thierry (2018-01-23 00:41:07)
>> > > On 1/22/2018 4:31 PM, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>> > > > So for this file what I understand is that it should be:
>> > > > 
>> > > >       // SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
>> > > >       // Copyright (C) 2014-2018 Intel Corporation
>> > > 
>> > > So be it.
>> > 
>> > Oh no, we don't do C++ comments.
>> 
>> We drm or we kernel devs?
>> 
>> $ git grep "// SPDX"| wc -l 
>> 4487
>> 
>> The suggestion was actually from Linus in the thread I linked. Quoting
>> here:
>> 
>> > So in general, the _hope_ is that we can just end up replacing
>> > existing boilerplate comments with that single line SPDX comment
>> > (using "//" in *.[ch] files, but obviously some other kinds of files
>> > end up having a different comment character, typically '#').
>> ...
>> > And yes, feel free to replace block comments with // while at it.
>> ...
>> > We already have something like 700 different versions of the same
>> > silly copyright license boiler-plate due to typos, whitespace
>> > differences, comment style choices, yadda yadda. Let's avoid that mess
>> > by just picking _one_ single format and placement for the SPDX line.
>> 
>> Which I agree with, hence my suggestion. Let me know if it should be
>> different in drm/
>
> Being consistent is far more important.
> Documentation/process/coding-style.rst is what we follow, breaking the
> rule and being inconsistent for copyright headers doesn't make any sense.

Please use /* */ rather than // in i915 throughout.

BR,
Jani.

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list