[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915/bxt, glk: Avoid long atomic poll during CDCLK change
Imre Deak
imre.deak at intel.com
Tue Jan 30 14:29:39 UTC 2018
There is no requirement for doing the PCODE request polling atomically,
so do that only for a short time switching to sleeping poll afterwards.
The specification requires a 150usec timeout for the change notification,
so let's use that for the atomic poll. Do the extra 2ms poll - needed as
a workaround on BXT/GLK - in sleeping mode.
v2:
- rebase on v2 of patchset dropping the sandybridge_pcode_read/write
refactoring (Chris)
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 5 +++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 6 ++++--
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 7e83d0d3e632..08c6c824d7f8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -3724,9 +3724,10 @@ extern void intel_display_print_error_state(struct drm_i915_error_state_buf *e,
int sandybridge_pcode_read(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 mbox, u32 *val);
int sandybridge_pcode_write_timeout(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 mbox,
- u32 val, int timeout_us);
+ u32 val, int fast_timeout_us,
+ int slow_timeout_ms);
#define sandybridge_pcode_write(dev_priv, mbox, val) \
- sandybridge_pcode_write_timeout(dev_priv, mbox, val, 500)
+ sandybridge_pcode_write_timeout(dev_priv, mbox, val, 500, 0)
int skl_pcode_request(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 mbox, u32 request,
u32 reply_mask, u32 reply, int timeout_base_ms);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
index a423b674fcec..ee788d5be5e3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
@@ -1378,7 +1378,7 @@ static void bxt_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
ret = sandybridge_pcode_write_timeout(dev_priv,
HSW_PCODE_DE_WRITE_FREQ_REQ,
- 0x80000000, 2000);
+ 0x80000000, 150, 2);
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
if (ret) {
@@ -1417,7 +1417,7 @@ static void bxt_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
*/
ret = sandybridge_pcode_write_timeout(dev_priv,
HSW_PCODE_DE_WRITE_FREQ_REQ,
- cdclk_state->voltage_level, 2000);
+ cdclk_state->voltage_level, 150, 2);
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
if (ret) {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index a6098932be5a..19f00f7c7868 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -9170,7 +9170,8 @@ int sandybridge_pcode_read(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 mbox, u32 *val
}
int sandybridge_pcode_write_timeout(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
- u32 mbox, u32 val, int timeout_us)
+ u32 mbox, u32 val,
+ int fast_timeout_us, int slow_timeout_ms)
{
int status;
@@ -9193,7 +9194,8 @@ int sandybridge_pcode_write_timeout(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
if (__intel_wait_for_register_fw(dev_priv,
GEN6_PCODE_MAILBOX, GEN6_PCODE_READY, 0,
- timeout_us, 0, NULL)) {
+ fast_timeout_us, slow_timeout_ms,
+ NULL)) {
DRM_ERROR("timeout waiting for pcode write of 0x%08x to mbox %x to finish for %ps\n",
val, mbox, __builtin_return_address(0));
return -ETIMEDOUT;
--
2.13.2
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list