[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 05/17] lib: Spin fast, retire early
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Mon Jul 2 15:36:28 UTC 2018
On 02/07/2018 10:07, Chris Wilson wrote:
> When using the pollable spinner, we often want to use it as a means of
> ensuring the task is running on the GPU before switching to something
> else. In which case we don't want to add extra delay inside the spinner,
> but the current 1000 NOPs add on order of 5us, which is often larger
> than the target latency.
>
> v2: Don't change perf_pmu as that is sensitive to the extra CPU latency
> from a tight GPU spinner.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Reviewed-by: Antonio Argenziano <antonio.argenziano at intel.com> #v1
> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com> #v1
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> ---
> lib/igt_dummyload.c | 3 ++-
> lib/igt_dummyload.h | 1 +
> tests/gem_ctx_isolation.c | 1 +
> tests/gem_eio.c | 1 +
> tests/gem_exec_latency.c | 4 ++--
> 5 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/igt_dummyload.c b/lib/igt_dummyload.c
> index 94efdf745..7beb66244 100644
> --- a/lib/igt_dummyload.c
> +++ b/lib/igt_dummyload.c
> @@ -199,7 +199,8 @@ emit_recursive_batch(igt_spin_t *spin,
> * between function calls, that appears enough to keep SNB out of
> * trouble. See https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102262
> */
> - batch += 1000;
> + if (!(opts->flags & IGT_SPIN_FAST))
> + batch += 1000;
igt_require(!snb) or something, given the comment whose last two lines
can be seen in the diff above?
Regards,
Tvrtko
>
> /* recurse */
> r = &relocs[obj[BATCH].relocation_count++];
> diff --git a/lib/igt_dummyload.h b/lib/igt_dummyload.h
> index c794f2544..e80a12451 100644
> --- a/lib/igt_dummyload.h
> +++ b/lib/igt_dummyload.h
> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ struct igt_spin_factory {
>
> #define IGT_SPIN_FENCE_OUT (1 << 0)
> #define IGT_SPIN_POLL_RUN (1 << 1)
> +#define IGT_SPIN_FAST (1 << 2)
>
> igt_spin_t *
> __igt_spin_batch_factory(int fd, const struct igt_spin_factory *opts);
> diff --git a/tests/gem_ctx_isolation.c b/tests/gem_ctx_isolation.c
> index 2e19e8c03..4325e1c28 100644
> --- a/tests/gem_ctx_isolation.c
> +++ b/tests/gem_ctx_isolation.c
> @@ -560,6 +560,7 @@ static void inject_reset_context(int fd, unsigned int engine)
> struct igt_spin_factory opts = {
> .ctx = gem_context_create(fd),
> .engine = engine,
> + .flags = IGT_SPIN_FAST,
> };
> igt_spin_t *spin;
>
> diff --git a/tests/gem_eio.c b/tests/gem_eio.c
> index 0ec1aaec9..3162a3170 100644
> --- a/tests/gem_eio.c
> +++ b/tests/gem_eio.c
> @@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ static igt_spin_t * __spin_poll(int fd, uint32_t ctx, unsigned long flags)
> struct igt_spin_factory opts = {
> .ctx = ctx,
> .engine = flags,
> + .flags = IGT_SPIN_FAST,
> };
>
> if (gem_can_store_dword(fd, opts.engine))
> diff --git a/tests/gem_exec_latency.c b/tests/gem_exec_latency.c
> index 75811f325..de16322a6 100644
> --- a/tests/gem_exec_latency.c
> +++ b/tests/gem_exec_latency.c
> @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ poll_ring(int fd, unsigned ring, const char *name)
> {
> const struct igt_spin_factory opts = {
> .engine = ring,
> - .flags = IGT_SPIN_POLL_RUN,
> + .flags = IGT_SPIN_POLL_RUN | IGT_SPIN_FAST,
> };
> struct timespec tv = {};
> unsigned long cycles;
> @@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ rthog_latency_on_ring(int fd, unsigned int engine, const char *name, unsigned in
> #define MMAP_SZ (64 << 10)
> const struct igt_spin_factory opts = {
> .engine = engine,
> - .flags = IGT_SPIN_POLL_RUN,
> + .flags = IGT_SPIN_POLL_RUN | IGT_SPIN_FAST,
> };
> struct rt_pkt *results;
> unsigned int engines[16];
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list