[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Use crtc_state->has_psr instead of CAN_PSR for pipe update

[Tarun Vyas]

In commit "drm/i915: Wait for PSR exit before checking for vblank
evasion", the idea was to limit the PSR IDLE checks when PSR is
actually supported. While CAN_PSR does do that check, it doesn't
applies on a per-crtc basis. crtc_state->has_psr is a more granular
check that avoids everything but pipe A, for the PSR IDLE check.

With this, the PSR IDLE check should be a *no-op* for all but pipe A
which is what was intended originally.

Fixes: a608987970b9 ("drm/i915: Wait for PSR exit before checking for
vblank evasion")

v2: Remove unnecessary parantheses, make checkpatch happy.

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tarun Vyas <tarun.vyas at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
index 4990d6e84ddf..83880e3a5f3d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ void intel_pipe_update_start(const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state)
 	 * VBL interrupts will start the PSR exit and prevent a PSR
 	 * re-entry as well.
 	 */
-	if (CAN_PSR(dev_priv) && intel_psr_wait_for_idle(dev_priv))
+	if (new_crtc_state->has_psr && intel_psr_wait_for_idle(dev_priv))
 		DRM_ERROR("PSR idle timed out, atomic update may fail\n");
 
 	local_irq_disable();
-- 
2.13.5