[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Filter out both physical address swizzles

Chris Wilson chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Mon Jul 9 19:49:15 UTC 2018


In our swizzling selftests, we cannot predict the physical address of
the target page (at least not simply!) and so skip bit17 swizzles.
However, there are two bit17 swizzle modes and we only skipped on, with
the second being observed on the lab gdg causing the test to fail,
as soon as we hit a page with bit17 set it its address.

Testcase: igt/drv_selftest/live_objects #gdg
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_object.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_object.c
index d77acf4cc439..c69cbd5aed52 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_object.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_object.c
@@ -375,7 +375,8 @@ static int igt_partial_tiling(void *arg)
 		}
 
 		GEM_BUG_ON(tile.swizzle == I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_UNKNOWN);
-		if (tile.swizzle == I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_9_10_17)
+		if (tile.swizzle == I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_9_17 ||
+		    tile.swizzle == I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_9_10_17)
 			continue;
 
 		if (INTEL_GEN(i915) <= 2) {
-- 
2.18.0



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list