[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: Remove few mod parameters option.

[Rodrigo Vivi]

On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:08:17PM -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 22:27 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > Reduce the module parameter to enable or disable.
> > 
> > The link stand by vs full link off was used only once.
> > 
> > And it was actually masking another bug fixed by commit
> > '84bb2916a683 ("drm/i915/psr: Check for SET_POWER_CAPABLE
> > bit at PSR init time.")'
> > 
> > So, let's remove these options for now. End goal is to
> > fully remove the mod param, moving it to a debugfs
> > interface in upcoming patches.
> Sounds like a good idea, but I have not had use for this module
> parameter anyway. 
> > 
> > Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com>

Thanks

> 
> What do you think of using enable_psr=1 to force PSR1 and enable_psr=2
> to force PSR2 on PSR2 capable panels?

dam... you are messing up with my next patch that I
have here hehehe

my idea here is from the regular path we call intel_psr_enable
that would check platform defaults and vbt and call
_intel_psr_enable

and for debugfs I was creating a toggle function
1 - enable
0 - disable

and change _intel_psr_enable to check crtc active.

If we add psr2 selection to the picture now I have to think
better ideas on how to handle this flow...

------

hmmm

maybe change intel_psr_enable signature to receive the type

enum psr_type
{
DEFAULT = 0,
PSR = 1,
PSR2 = 2,
};

so on regular path we would call
intel_psr_enable(..., DEFAULT);

on debugfs
intel_psr_enable(..., val);

?!

Better and/or cleaner ideas?

Thanks,
Rodrigo.

> 
> > Cc: Tarun Vyas <tarun.vyas at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c |  2 +-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c   | 10 ----------
> >  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> > index 49fcc4679db6..817576701ed7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> > @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ i915_param_named_unsafe(enable_ppgtt, int, 0400,
> >  
> >  i915_param_named_unsafe(enable_psr, int, 0600,
> >  	"Enable PSR "
> > -	"(0=disabled, 1=enabled - link mode chosen per-platform,
> > 2=force link-standby mode, 3=force link-off mode) "
> > +	"(0=disabled, 1=enabled) "
> >  	"Default: -1 (use per-chip default)");
> >  
> >  i915_param_named_unsafe(alpha_support, bool, 0400,
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > index 23acc9ac8d4d..ea467e2798e2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > @@ -966,16 +966,6 @@ void intel_psr_init(struct drm_i915_private
> > *dev_priv)
> >  		/* For new platforms let's respect VBT back again */
> >  		dev_priv->psr.link_standby = dev_priv-
> > >vbt.psr.full_link;
> >  
> > -	/* Override link_standby x link_off defaults */
> > -	if (i915_modparams.enable_psr == 2 && !dev_priv-
> > >psr.link_standby) {
> > -		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR: Forcing link standby\n");
> > -		dev_priv->psr.link_standby = true;
> > -	}
> > -	if (i915_modparams.enable_psr == 3 && dev_priv-
> > >psr.link_standby) {
> > -		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR: Forcing main link off\n");
> > -		dev_priv->psr.link_standby = false;
> > -	}
> > -
> >  	INIT_WORK(&dev_priv->psr.work, intel_psr_work);
> >  	mutex_init(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
> >  }