[Intel-gfx] [RFC] i915: make the probe asynchronous
Daniel Vetter
daniel at ffwll.ch
Thu Jul 12 07:37:41 UTC 2018
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 8:56 AM, Takashi Iwai <tiwai at suse.de> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 08:54:34 +0200,
> Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 09:29:01AM +0800, Feng Tang wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 10:29:16AM +0800, Feng Tang wrote:
>> > > On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 05:36:32PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi Daneil/Jani/Takashi,
>> > >
>> > > When I was testing this patch from Takashi, I further checked the kernel
>> > > module code, and found that: we may need NOT to add any new codes to
>> > > prepare for i915's async probe feature!
>> > >
>> > > Say when i915 module is being loader due to HDA's request_module() call,
>> > > in the callchain, do_init_module() has such code:
>> > >
>> > > if (!mod->async_probe_requested && (current->flags & PF_USED_ASYNC))
>> > > async_synchronize_full();
>> > >
>> > > This will garantee the asynced probe is done before it returns.
>> > >
>> > > I have just tested and this seems to be enough. If I am not wrong, then
>> > > we can take the i915 async patch directly. What do you think?
>> >
>> > Ping for comments, thanks!
>>
>> Ram (who's working on the hdcp2 code) just learned the hard way that if
>> i915 registration gets delayed then audio fails to load. So if you want to
>> make i915 fully async, then you _must_ fix the audio load stuff.
>
> Does my component completion patch help for that scenario?
Hm, must have missed it. Do you have a patchwork link?
Also adding Ram so he can test this out.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list