[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: Split sink status into a separate debugfs node
Rodrigo Vivi
rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Thu Jul 12 23:26:49 UTC 2018
On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 05:31:21PM -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> This allows to read i915_edp_psr_status from tests without triggering
> any AUX communication. Take this opportunity to move this under the
> eDP-1 connector directory as the status we print is of the sink.
>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index f6142d78ede4..5069d5dedafe 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -2592,6 +2592,41 @@ static const struct file_operations i915_guc_log_relay_fops = {
> .release = i915_guc_log_relay_release,
> };
>
> +static int i915_psr_sink_status_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> +{
> + u8 val;
> + static const char * const sink_status[] = {
> + "inactive",
> + "transition to active, capture and display",
> + "active, display from RFB",
> + "active, capture and display on sink device timings",
> + "transition to inactive, capture and display, timing re-sync",
> + "reserved",
> + "reserved",
> + "sink internal error",
> + };
> + struct drm_connector *connector = m->private;
> + struct intel_dp *intel_dp =
> + enc_to_intel_dp(&intel_attached_encoder(connector)->base);
> +
> + if (connector->status != connector_status_connected)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_STATUS, &val) == 1) {
> + const char *str = "unknown";
> +
> + val &= DP_PSR_SINK_STATE_MASK;
> + if (val < ARRAY_SIZE(sink_status))
> + str = sink_status[val];
> + seq_printf(m, "Sink PSR status: 0x%x [%s]\n", val, str);
> + } else {
> + DRM_ERROR("dpcd read (at %u) failed\n", DP_PSR_STATUS);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(i915_psr_sink_status);
> +
> static void
> psr_source_status(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, struct seq_file *m)
> {
> @@ -2643,26 +2678,6 @@ psr_source_status(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, struct seq_file *m)
> seq_printf(m, "Source PSR status: 0x%x [%s]\n", psr_status, "unknown");
> }
>
> -static const char *psr_sink_status(u8 val)
> -{
> - static const char * const sink_status[] = {
> - "inactive",
> - "transition to active, capture and display",
> - "active, display from RFB",
> - "active, capture and display on sink device timings",
> - "transition to inactive, capture and display, timing re-sync",
> - "reserved",
> - "reserved",
> - "sink internal error"
> - };
> -
> - val &= DP_PSR_SINK_STATE_MASK;
> - if (val < ARRAY_SIZE(sink_status))
> - return sink_status[val];
> -
> - return "unknown";
> -}
> -
> static int i915_edp_psr_status(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = node_to_i915(m->private);
> @@ -2706,15 +2721,6 @@ static int i915_edp_psr_status(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> }
>
> psr_source_status(dev_priv, m);
> -
> - if (dev_priv->psr.enabled) {
> - struct drm_dp_aux *aux = &dev_priv->psr.enabled->aux;
> - u8 val;
> -
> - if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(aux, DP_PSR_STATUS, &val) == 1)
> - seq_printf(m, "Sink PSR status: 0x%x [%s]\n", val,
> - psr_sink_status(val));
> - }
> mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
>
> if (READ_ONCE(dev_priv->psr.debug)) {
> @@ -4971,9 +4977,12 @@ int i915_debugfs_connector_add(struct drm_connector *connector)
> debugfs_create_file("i915_dpcd", S_IRUGO, root,
> connector, &i915_dpcd_fops);
>
> - if (connector->connector_type == DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP)
> + if (connector->connector_type == DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP) {
> debugfs_create_file("i915_panel_timings", S_IRUGO, root,
> connector, &i915_panel_fops);
> + debugfs_create_file("i915_psr_sink_status", S_IRUGO, root,
> + connector, &i915_psr_sink_status_fops);
my OCD on names here about i915_psr vs i915_edp_psr is still a real thing although
they are on different places ;)
We could probably remove "_edp" from the others, because psr is an edp only after all....
Anyways let's not block the progress here ;)
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> + }
>
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 2.14.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list