[Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v7] tests/kms_rotation_crc: Move platform checks to one place for non exhaust fence cases
Dhinakaran Pandiyan
dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com
Tue Jul 24 02:52:44 UTC 2018
On Mon, 2018-07-23 at 11:25 -0700, Radhakrishna Sripada wrote:
> From: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa at intel.com>
>
> Cleanup the testcases by moving the platform checks to a single
> function.
>
> The earlier version of the path is posted here [1]
>
> v2: Make use of the property enums to get the supported rotations
> v3: Move hardcodings to a single function(Ville)
> v4: Include the cherryview exception for reflect subtest(Maarten)
> v5: Rebase and move the check from CNL to ICL for reflect-x case
> v6: Fix the CI regression
> v7: rebase
>
> [1]: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/209647/
>
Oh well, I wrote my comments below and then read this link. Please add
new test requirements in separate patches. Only have the code movement
here.
> Cc: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada at intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada at intel.com>
> ---
> tests/kms_rotation_crc.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c b/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c
> index 6cb5858adb0f..f20b8a6d4ba1 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ typedef struct {
> uint32_t override_fmt;
> uint64_t override_tiling;
> int devid;
> + int gen;
> } data_t;
>
> typedef struct {
> @@ -284,6 +285,17 @@ static void prepare_fbs(data_t *data,
> igt_output_t *output,
> igt_plane_set_position(plane, data->pos_x, data-
> >pos_y);
> }
>
> +static void igt_check_rotation(data_t *data)
> +{
> + if (data->rotation & (IGT_ROTATION_90 | IGT_ROTATION_270))
> + igt_require(data->gen >= 9);
> + if (data->rotation & IGT_REFLECT_X)
> + igt_require(data->gen >= 11 ||
This check used to be igt_require(gen >= 10
> + (IS_CHERRYVIEW(data->devid) && (data-
> >rotation & IGT_ROTATION_0)));
There was also a check for tiling format
- (IS_CHERRYVIEW(data.devid) &&
reflect_x->rot == IGT_ROTATION_0
- && reflect_x->tiling ==
LOCAL_I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED));
> + if (data->rotation & IGT_ROTATION_180)
> + igt_require(data->gen >= 4);
Doesn't look like this requirement was is in the test earlier.
> +}
> +
> static void test_single_case(data_t *data, enum pipe pipe,
> igt_output_t *output, igt_plane_t
> *plane,
> enum rectangle_type rect,
> @@ -352,15 +364,18 @@ static void test_plane_rotation(data_t *data,
> int plane_type, bool test_bad_form
>
> igt_display_require_output(display);
>
> + igt_check_rotation(data);
> +
> for_each_pipe_with_valid_output(display, pipe, output) {
> igt_plane_t *plane;
> int i, j;
>
> - if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(data->devid) && pipe != PIPE_B)
> - continue;
> -
> igt_output_set_pipe(output, pipe);
>
> + if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(data->devid) && (data->rotation &
> IGT_REFLECT_X) &&
> + pipe != kmstest_pipe_to_index('B'))
> + continue;
> +
Why do this?
> plane = igt_output_get_plane_type(output,
> plane_type);
> igt_require(igt_plane_has_prop(plane,
> IGT_PLANE_ROTATION));
>
> @@ -521,14 +536,13 @@ igt_main
> };
>
> data_t data = {};
> - int gen = 0;
>
> igt_skip_on_simulation();
>
> igt_fixture {
> data.gfx_fd = drm_open_driver_master(DRIVER_INTEL);
> data.devid = intel_get_drm_devid(data.gfx_fd);
> - gen = intel_gen(data.devid);
> + data.gen = intel_gen(data.devid);
>
> kmstest_set_vt_graphics_mode();
>
> @@ -541,16 +555,12 @@ igt_main
> igt_subtest_f("%s-rotation-%s",
> plane_test_str(subtest->plane),
> rot_test_str(subtest->rot)) {
> - igt_require(!(subtest->rot &
> - (IGT_ROTATION_90 |
> IGT_ROTATION_270)) ||
> - gen >= 9);
> data.rotation = subtest->rot;
> test_plane_rotation(&data, subtest->plane,
> false);
> }
> }
>
> igt_subtest_f("sprite-rotation-90-pos-100-0") {
> - igt_require(gen >= 9);
> data.rotation = IGT_ROTATION_90;
> data.pos_x = 100,
> data.pos_y = 0;
> @@ -560,7 +570,6 @@ igt_main
> data.pos_y = 0;
>
> igt_subtest_f("bad-pixel-format") {
> - igt_require(gen >= 9);
> data.rotation = IGT_ROTATION_90;
> data.override_fmt = DRM_FORMAT_RGB565;
> test_plane_rotation(&data, DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY,
> true);
> @@ -568,7 +577,6 @@ igt_main
> data.override_fmt = 0;
>
> igt_subtest_f("bad-tiling") {
> - igt_require(gen >= 9);
> data.rotation = IGT_ROTATION_90;
> data.override_tiling =
> LOCAL_I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED;
> test_plane_rotation(&data, DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY,
> true);
> @@ -579,9 +587,6 @@ igt_main
> igt_subtest_f("primary-%s-reflect-x-%s",
> tiling_test_str(reflect_x->tiling),
> rot_test_str(reflect_x->rot)) {
> - igt_require(gen >= 10 ||
> - (IS_CHERRYVIEW(data.devid) &&
> reflect_x->rot == IGT_ROTATION_0
> - && reflect_x->tiling ==
> LOCAL_I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED));
> data.rotation = (IGT_REFLECT_X | reflect_x-
> >rot);
> data.override_tiling = reflect_x->tiling;
> test_plane_rotation(&data,
> DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY, false);
> @@ -596,7 +601,7 @@ igt_main
> enum pipe pipe;
> igt_output_t *output;
>
> - igt_require(gen >= 9);
> + igt_require(data.gen >= 9);
> igt_display_require_output(&data.display);
>
> for_each_pipe_with_valid_output(&data.display, pipe,
> output) {
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list