[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/icl: Update FIA supported lane count for hpd.

[Paulo Zanoni]

Em Qua, 2018-07-25 às 09:52 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi escreveu:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 05:28:11PM -0700, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> > From: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna at intel.com>
> > 
> > In ICL, Flexible IO Adapter (FIA) muxes data and clocks of USB 3.1,
> > tbt and display controller. In DP alt mode FIA configure the
> > number of lanes and will be used apart from DPCD read to calculate
> > max
> > available lanes for DP enablement.
> > 
> > v2 (from Paulo): Simple rebase.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa at intel.com> (v1).
> > Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna at intel.com>
> > [Paulo: significant rewrite of the patch.]
> > Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h |  3 +++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 33
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > index 93de6f724e77..72acecaad5c1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > @@ -10705,5 +10705,8 @@ enum skl_power_gate {
> >  #define PORT_TX_DFLEXDPSP			_MMIO(0x1638A0)
> >  #define   TC_LIVE_STATE_TBT(tc_port)		(1 <<
> > ((tc_port) * 8 + 6))
> >  #define   TC_LIVE_STATE_TC(tc_port)		(1 <<
> > ((tc_port) * 8 + 5))
> > +#define   DP_LANE_ASSIGNMENT_SHIFT(tc_port)	((tc_port) * 8)
> > +#define   DP_LANE_ASSIGNMENT_MASK(tc_port)	(0xf <<
> > ((tc_port) * 8))
> > +#define   DP_LANE_ASSIGNMENT(tc_port, x)	((x) << ((tc_port)
> > * 8))
> >  
> >  #endif /* _I915_REG_H_ */
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > index 90c5ba6b222b..bb59e71d6f9c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > @@ -176,14 +176,45 @@ static int intel_dp_max_common_rate(struct
> > intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >  	return intel_dp->common_rates[intel_dp->num_common_rates -
> > 1];
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int intel_dp_get_fia_supported_lane_count(struct intel_dp
> > *intel_dp)
> > +{
> > +	struct intel_digital_port *dig_port =
> > dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> > +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dig_port-
> > >base.base.dev);
> > +	enum tc_port tc_port = intel_port_to_tc(dev_priv,
> > dig_port->base.port);
> > +	u32 lane_info;
> > +
> > +	if (tc_port == PORT_TC_NONE || dig_port->tc_type !=
> > TC_PORT_TYPEC)
> > +		return 4;
> > +
> > +	lane_info = (I915_READ(PORT_TX_DFLEXDPSP) &
> > +		     DP_LANE_ASSIGNMENT_MASK(tc_port)) >>
> > +		    DP_LANE_ASSIGNMENT_SHIFT(tc_port);
> > +
> > +	switch (lane_info) {
> > +	default:
> > +		MISSING_CASE(lane_info);
> > +	case 1:
> > +	case 2:
> > +	case 4:
> > +	case 8:
> > +		return 1;
> > +	case 3:
> > +	case 12:
> > +		return 2;
> > +	case 15:
> > +		return 4;
> 
> what about replacing this entire switch per a simple
> 
> return hweight8(lane_info);
> 
> ?

It kills our ability to hit MISSING_CASE for 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13 and
14. I think it's always good to revalidate our hardware/spec
assumptions for the newer platforms (although we don't seem to be
hitting this as far as I have tested).

> 
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> >  /* Theoretical max between source and sink */
> >  static int intel_dp_max_common_lane_count(struct intel_dp
> > *intel_dp)
> >  {
> >  	struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port =
> > dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> >  	int source_max = intel_dig_port->max_lanes;
> >  	int sink_max = drm_dp_max_lane_count(intel_dp->dpcd);
> > +	int fia_max =
> > intel_dp_get_fia_supported_lane_count(intel_dp);
> >  
> > -	return min(source_max, sink_max);
> > +	return min3(source_max, sink_max, fia_max);
> >  }
> >  
> >  int intel_dp_max_lane_count(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > -- 
> > 2.17.1
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx