[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/icl: Set TBT IO in Aux transaction
Paulo Zanoni
paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com
Wed Jul 25 23:08:14 UTC 2018
Em Qua, 2018-07-25 às 14:28 -0700, Anusha Srivatsa escreveu:
> For a TBT sequence, we need to set the IO type to TBT
> in DDI_AUX_CTL.
>
> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> -----
> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 5530c47..7bdc214 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -5558,6 +5558,7 @@ enum {
> #define DP_AUX_CH_CTL_PSR_DATA_AUX_REG_SKL (1 << 14)
> #define DP_AUX_CH_CTL_FS_DATA_AUX_REG_SKL (1 << 13)
> #define DP_AUX_CH_CTL_GTC_DATA_AUX_REG_SKL (1 << 12)
> +#define DP_AUX_CH_CTL_TBT_IO (1 << 11)
> #define DP_AUX_CH_CTL_FW_SYNC_PULSE_SKL_MASK (0x1f << 5)
> #define DP_AUX_CH_CTL_FW_SYNC_PULSE_SKL(c) (((c) - 1) << 5)
> #define DP_AUX_CH_CTL_SYNC_PULSE_SKL(c) ((c) - 1)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index cc33d7c..90a8e2f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -1208,15 +1208,31 @@ static uint32_t skl_get_aux_send_ctl(struct
> intel_dp *intel_dp,
> int send_bytes,
> uint32_t unused)
> {
> - return DP_AUX_CH_CTL_SEND_BUSY |
> - DP_AUX_CH_CTL_DONE |
> - DP_AUX_CH_CTL_INTERRUPT |
> - DP_AUX_CH_CTL_TIME_OUT_ERROR |
> - DP_AUX_CH_CTL_TIME_OUT_MAX |
> - DP_AUX_CH_CTL_RECEIVE_ERROR |
> - (send_bytes << DP_AUX_CH_CTL_MESSAGE_SIZE_SHIFT) |
> - DP_AUX_CH_CTL_FW_SYNC_PULSE_SKL(32) |
> - DP_AUX_CH_CTL_SYNC_PULSE_SKL(32);
> + struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port =
> dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(intel_dig_port-
> >base.base.dev);
> +
> + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11
There's no need for this check, since intel_dig_port->tc_type can't be
TC_PORT_TBT on platforms earlier than gen11.
If we were to add a check, I'd suggest to use intel_port_is_tc(), but I
don't see the need.
There's a lot of avoidable duplicate code. Please avoid it with
something like:
---
uint32_t ret;
ret = DP_AUX_CH_CTL_SEND_BUSY |
DP_AUX_CH_CTL_DONE |
etc;
if (intel_dig_port->tc_type == TC_PORT_TBT)
ret |= DP_AUX_CH_CTL_TBT_IO;
return ret;
---
Thanks,
Paulo
> && intel_dig_port->tc_type == TC_PORT_TBT) {
> + return DP_AUX_CH_CTL_SEND_BUSY |
> + DP_AUX_CH_CTL_DONE |
> + DP_AUX_CH_CTL_INTERRUPT |
> + DP_AUX_CH_CTL_TIME_OUT_ERROR |
> + DP_AUX_CH_CTL_TIME_OUT_MAX |
> + DP_AUX_CH_CTL_RECEIVE_ERROR |
> + (send_bytes <<
> DP_AUX_CH_CTL_MESSAGE_SIZE_SHIFT) |
> + DP_AUX_CH_CTL_TBT_IO |
> + DP_AUX_CH_CTL_FW_SYNC_PULSE_SKL(32) |
> + DP_AUX_CH_CTL_SYNC_PULSE_SKL(32);
> + } else {
> + return DP_AUX_CH_CTL_SEND_BUSY |
> + DP_AUX_CH_CTL_DONE |
> + DP_AUX_CH_CTL_INTERRUPT |
> + DP_AUX_CH_CTL_TIME_OUT_ERROR |
> + DP_AUX_CH_CTL_TIME_OUT_MAX |
> + DP_AUX_CH_CTL_RECEIVE_ERROR |
> + (send_bytes <<
> DP_AUX_CH_CTL_MESSAGE_SIZE_SHIFT) |
> + DP_AUX_CH_CTL_FW_SYNC_PULSE_SKL(32) |
> + DP_AUX_CH_CTL_SYNC_PULSE_SKL(32);
> + }
> }
>
> static int
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list