[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Allow control of PSR at runtime through debugfs, v3.

Dhinakaran Pandiyan dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com
Fri Jul 27 03:27:51 UTC 2018


On Thu, 2018-07-26 at 11:06 +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Currently tests modify i915.enable_psr and then do a modeset cycle
> to change PSR. We can write a value to i915_edp_psr_status to force
> a certain value without a modeset.
> 
> To retain compatibility with older userspace, we also still allow
> the override through the module parameter, and add some tracking
> to check whether a debugfs mode is specified.
> 
> Changes since v1:
> - Rename dev_priv->psr.enabled to .dp, and .hw_configured to
> .enabled.
> - Fix i915_psr_debugfs_mode to match the writes to debugfs.
> - Rename __i915_edp_psr_write to intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode, simplify
>   it and move it to intel_psr.c. This keeps all internals in
> intel_psr.c
> - Perform an interruptible wait for hw completion outside of the psr
>   lock, instead of being forced to trywait and return -EBUSY.
> Changes since v2:
> - Rebase on top of intel_psr changes.

Thanks for resending this, I have some questions to understand the
patch better.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c |  75 ++++++++++++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h     |   9 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h    |   3 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c    | 154 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ----
>  4 files changed, 214 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index 59dc0610ea44..b2904bb2be49 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -2689,14 +2689,11 @@ psr_source_status(struct drm_i915_private
> *dev_priv, struct seq_file *m)
>  
>  static int i915_edp_psr_status(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>  {
> -	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = node_to_i915(m-
> >private);
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = m->private;
>  	u32 psrperf = 0;
>  	bool enabled = false;
>  	bool sink_support;
>  
> -	if (!HAS_PSR(dev_priv))
> -		return -ENODEV;
> -
>  	sink_support = dev_priv->psr.sink_support;
>  	seq_printf(m, "Sink_Support: %s\n", yesno(sink_support));
>  	if (!sink_support)
> @@ -2705,7 +2702,7 @@ static int i915_edp_psr_status(struct seq_file
> *m, void *data)
>  	intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
> -	seq_printf(m, "Enabled: %s\n", yesno((bool)dev_priv-
> >psr.enabled));
> +	seq_printf(m, "Enabled: %s\n", yesno(dev_priv-
> >psr.enabled));
>  	seq_printf(m, "Busy frontbuffer bits: 0x%03x\n",
>  		   dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits);
>  
> @@ -2776,6 +2773,72 @@
> DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(i915_edp_psr_debug_fops,
>  			i915_edp_psr_debug_get,
> i915_edp_psr_debug_set,
>  			"%llu\n");
>  
> +static ssize_t i915_edp_psr_write(struct file *file, const char
> __user *ubuf,
> +				  size_t len, loff_t *offp)
> +{
> +	struct seq_file *m = file->private_data;
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = m->private;
> +	struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx ctx;
> +	int ret, val;
> +
> +	if (!dev_priv->psr.sink_support)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	ret = kstrtoint_from_user(ubuf, len, 10, &val);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		bool enable;
> +		ret = kstrtobool_from_user(ubuf, len, &enable);
> +
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			return ret;
> +
> +		val = enable;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (val != PSR_DEBUGFS_MODE_DEFAULT &&
> +	    val != PSR_DEBUGFS_MODE_DISABLED &&
> +	    val != PSR_DEBUGFS_MODE_ENABLED)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
> +
> +	drm_modeset_acquire_init(&ctx,
> DRM_MODESET_ACQUIRE_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> +
> +retry:
> +	ret = intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode(dev_priv, &ctx, val);
> +	if (ret == -EBUSY) {
> +		ret = drm_modeset_backoff(&ctx);
> +		if (!ret)
> +			goto retry;
> +	}
> +
> +	drm_modeset_drop_locks(&ctx);
> +	drm_modeset_acquire_fini(&ctx);

Deadlocked here during testing

$ echo 0 >  /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/i915_edp_psr_status
bash: echo: write error: Resource deadlock avoided

[ 1248.856671] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1788 at
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modeset_lock.c:223 drm_modeset_drop_locks+0x56/0x60
[drm]
[ 1248.856757] Modules linked in: rfcomm cmac bnep arc4 iwlmvm
nls_iso8859_1 mac80211 snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek
snd_hda_codec_generic snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep
snd_hda_core iwlwifi snd_pcm snd_seq_midi snd_seq_midi_event
snd_rawmidi intel_rapl btusb btrtl snd_seq btbcm x86_pkg_temp_thermal
btintel intel_powerclamp bluetooth coretemp crct10dif_pclmul
crc32_pclmul snd_timer snd_seq_device ghash_clmulni_intel cfg80211
aesni_intel snd aes_x86_64 crypto_simd cryptd soundcore ecdh_generic
glue_helper input_leds mei_me mei intel_pch_thermal mac_hid parport_pc
ppdev lp parport autofs4 i915 i2c_algo_bit drm_kms_helper syscopyarea
sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops drm e1000e psmouse ahci libahci video
[ 1248.857288] CPU: 2 PID: 1788 Comm: bash Not tainted 4.18.0-rc6drm-
tip #138
[ 1248.857297] Hardware name: LENOVO 20F6CTO1WW/20F6CTO1WW, BIOS
R02ET48W (1.21 ) 06/01/2016
[ 1248.857354] RIP: 0010:drm_modeset_drop_locks+0x56/0x60 [drm]
[ 1248.857363] Code: 50 08 48 8d b8 50 ff ff ff 48 89 51 08 48 89 0a 48
89 00 48 89 40 08 e8 a8 90 7d c9 48 8b 43 70 49 39 c4 75 d2 5b 41 5c 5d
c3 <0f> 0b eb bc 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8b 97 d0 0a 00 00
[ 1248.857860] RSP: 0018:ffffa4dd01fabcf8 EFLAGS: 00010286
[ 1248.857878] RAX: 00000000ffffffdd RBX: ffffa4dd01fabd28 RCX:
0000000000000000
[ 1248.857889] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff97bb88476898 RDI:
ffffa4dd01fabd28
[ 1248.857898] RBP: ffffa4dd01fabd08 R08: 0000000000000000 R09:
0000000000000001
[ 1248.857908] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12:
0000000000000002
[ 1248.857918] R13: 00005603cdb60880 R14: 0000000000000002 R15:
ffffa4dd01fabee8
[ 1248.857930] FS:  00007f83b1dea740(0000) GS:ffff97bb99a00000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 1248.857940] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 1248.857950] CR2: 00005603cdb60880 CR3: 0000000214338003 CR4:
00000000003606e0
[ 1248.857959] Call Trace:
[ 1248.858094]  i915_edp_psr_write+0xd5/0x180 [i915]
[ 1248.858172]  full_proxy_write+0x5f/0x90
[ 1248.858207]  __vfs_write+0x3a/0x1a0
[ 1248.858227]  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x79/0x80
[ 1248.858243]  ? rcu_sync_lockdep_assert+0x32/0x60
[ 1248.858260]  ? __sb_start_write+0x135/0x190
[ 1248.858275]  ? vfs_write+0x193/0x1c0
[ 1248.858306]  vfs_write+0xc6/0x1c0
[ 1248.858335]  ksys_write+0x58/0xc0
[ 1248.858370]  __x64_sys_write+0x1a/0x20
[ 1248.858387]  do_syscall_64+0x65/0x1b0
[ 1248.858409]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[ 1248.858423] RIP: 0033:0x7f83b14f2154
[ 1248.858430] Code: 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00
00 00 00 66 90 48 8d 05 b1 07 2e 00 8b 00 85 c0 75 13 b8 01 00 00 00 0f
05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 54 f3 c3 66 90 41 54 55 49 89 d4 53 48 89 f5
[ 1248.858928] RSP: 002b:00007ffee7320168 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX:
0000000000000001
[ 1248.858946] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX:
00007f83b14f2154
[ 1248.858956] RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 00005603cdb60880 RDI:
0000000000000001
[ 1248.858965] RBP: 00005603cdb60880 R08: 000000000000000a R09:
0000000000000001
[ 1248.858975] R10: 000000000000000a R11: 0000000000000246 R12:
00007f83b17ce760
[ 1248.858984] R13: 0000000000000002 R14: 00007f83b17ca2a0 R15:
00007f83b17c9760
[ 1248.859043] irq event stamp: 59768
[ 1248.859058] hardirqs last  enabled at (59767): [<ffffffff89a31dc6>]
_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x36/0x60
[ 1248.859072] hardirqs last disabled at (59768): [<ffffffff89c01309>]
error_entry+0x89/0x110
[ 1248.859087] softirqs last  enabled at (59724): [<ffffffff89e00378>]
__do_softirq+0x378/0x4e3
[ 1248.859100] softirqs last disabled at (59711): [<ffffffff89098e0d>]
irq_exit+0xcd/0xe0
[ 1248.859156] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1788 at
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modeset_lock.c:223 drm_modeset_drop_locks+0x56/0x60
[drm]
[ 1248.859166] ---[ end trace b7222f9239d3065b ]--


> +
> +	intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
> +
> +	return ret ?: len;
> +}
> +
> +static int i915_edp_psr_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> +{
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = inode->i_private;
> +
> +	if (!HAS_PSR(dev_priv))
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	return single_open(file, i915_edp_psr_status, dev_priv);

What do you think of using "i915_edp_psr_debug" instead?

> +}
> +
> +static const struct file_operations i915_edp_psr_ops = {
> +	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
> +	.open = i915_edp_psr_open,
> +	.read = seq_read,
> +	.llseek = seq_lseek,
> +	.release = single_release,
> +	.write = i915_edp_psr_write
> +};
> +
>  static int i915_energy_uJ(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = node_to_i915(m-
> >private);
> @@ -4720,7 +4783,6 @@ static const struct drm_info_list
> i915_debugfs_list[] = {
>  	{"i915_swizzle_info", i915_swizzle_info, 0},
>  	{"i915_ppgtt_info", i915_ppgtt_info, 0},
>  	{"i915_llc", i915_llc, 0},
> -	{"i915_edp_psr_status", i915_edp_psr_status, 0},
>  	{"i915_energy_uJ", i915_energy_uJ, 0},
>  	{"i915_runtime_pm_status", i915_runtime_pm_status, 0},
>  	{"i915_power_domain_info", i915_power_domain_info, 0},
> @@ -4744,6 +4806,7 @@ static const struct i915_debugfs_files {
>  	const struct file_operations *fops;
>  } i915_debugfs_files[] = {
>  	{"i915_wedged", &i915_wedged_fops},
> +	{"i915_edp_psr_status", &i915_edp_psr_ops},
>  	{"i915_cache_sharing", &i915_cache_sharing_fops},
>  	{"i915_ring_missed_irq", &i915_ring_missed_irq_fops},
>  	{"i915_ring_test_irq", &i915_ring_test_irq_fops},
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 0f49f9988dfa..d8583770e8a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -612,7 +612,8 @@ struct i915_drrs {
>  struct i915_psr {
>  	struct mutex lock;
>  	bool sink_support;
> -	struct intel_dp *enabled;
> +	bool enabled;
> +	struct intel_dp *dp;
Separate patch for this change? How about keeping i915_psr.dp always
valid?

>  	bool active;
>  	struct work_struct work;
>  	unsigned busy_frontbuffer_bits;
> @@ -625,6 +626,12 @@ struct i915_psr {
>  	bool debug;
>  	ktime_t last_entry_attempt;
>  	ktime_t last_exit;
> +
> +	enum i915_psr_debugfs_mode {
> +		PSR_DEBUGFS_MODE_DEFAULT = -1,
> +		PSR_DEBUGFS_MODE_DISABLED,
> +		PSR_DEBUGFS_MODE_ENABLED

If we add another enum, we can write tests to enable PSR1 on PSR2
panels.
		PSR_DEBUGFS_MODE_PSR1
		PSR_DEBUGFS_MODE_PSR2
> +	} debugfs_mode;
>  };
>  
>  enum intel_pch {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index c275f91244a6..751ed257fbba 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -1926,6 +1926,9 @@ void intel_psr_enable(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp,
>  		      const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>  void intel_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  		      const struct intel_crtc_state
> *old_crtc_state);
> +int intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> +			       struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx *ctx,
> +			       enum i915_psr_debugfs_mode mode);
>  void intel_psr_invalidate(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  			  unsigned frontbuffer_bits,
>  			  enum fb_op_origin origin);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> index 4bd5768731ee..97424ae769f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> @@ -56,6 +56,16 @@
>  #include "intel_drv.h"
>  #include "i915_drv.h"
>  
> +static bool psr_global_enabled(enum i915_psr_debugfs_mode mode)
> +{
> +	if (mode == PSR_DEBUGFS_MODE_DEFAULT)
> +		return i915_modparams.enable_psr;
> +	else if (mode == PSR_DEBUGFS_MODE_DISABLED)
> +		return false;
> +	else
> +		return true;
> +}
> +
>  void intel_psr_irq_control(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, bool
> debug)
>  {
>  	u32 debug_mask, mask;
> @@ -471,11 +481,6 @@ void intel_psr_compute_config(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp,
>  	if (!CAN_PSR(dev_priv))
>  		return;
>  
> -	if (!i915_modparams.enable_psr) {
> -		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR disable by flag\n");
> -		return;
> -	}
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * HSW spec explicitly says PSR is tied to port A.
>  	 * BDW+ platforms with DDI implementation of PSR have
> different
> @@ -517,7 +522,11 @@ void intel_psr_compute_config(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp,
>  
>  	crtc_state->has_psr = true;
>  	crtc_state->has_psr2 = intel_psr2_config_valid(intel_dp,
> crtc_state);
> -	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Enabling PSR%s\n", crtc_state->has_psr2 ? "2"
> : "");
> +
> +	if (psr_global_enabled(dev_priv->psr.debugfs_mode))
> +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Enabling PSR%s\n", crtc_state-
> >has_psr2 ? "2" : "");
This gets printed during a modeset that is shutting down the crtc.

> +	else
> +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR disable by flag\n");


>  }

So, neither debugfs nor modparam has any effect on crtc_state->has_psr
or crtc_state->has_psr2. Why was this check moved to the end? 

We could also rewrite the debug message to look similar to the other
compute_config functions

>  
>  static void intel_psr_activate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> @@ -589,6 +598,22 @@ static void intel_psr_enable_source(struct
> intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static void intel_psr_enable_locked(struct drm_i915_private
> *dev_priv,
> +				    const struct intel_crtc_state
> *crtc_state)
> +{
> +	struct intel_dp *intel_dp = dev_priv->psr.dp;
> +
> +	if (dev_priv->psr.enabled)
> +		return;
> +
This function gets called from intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode() Doesn't
this allow debugfs to enable PSR even if mode related checks in
psr_compute_config() had failed? For e.g., crtc_state->has_psr was
false.

> +	intel_psr_setup_vsc(intel_dp, crtc_state);
> +	intel_psr_enable_sink(intel_dp);
> +	intel_psr_enable_source(intel_dp, crtc_state);
> +	dev_priv->psr.enabled = true;
> +
> +	intel_psr_activate(intel_dp);
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * intel_psr_enable - Enable PSR
>   * @intel_dp: Intel DP
> @@ -611,7 +636,7 @@ void intel_psr_enable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  
>  	WARN_ON(dev_priv->drrs.dp);
>  	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
> -	if (dev_priv->psr.enabled) {
> +	if (dev_priv->psr.dp) {

Check for dev_priv->psr.enabled instead?

>  		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR already in use\n");
>  		goto unlock;
>  	}
> @@ -619,12 +644,10 @@ void intel_psr_enable(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp,
>  	dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled = crtc_state->has_psr2;
>  	dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits = 0;
>  
> -	intel_psr_setup_vsc(intel_dp, crtc_state);
> -	intel_psr_enable_sink(intel_dp);
> -	intel_psr_enable_source(intel_dp, crtc_state);
> -	dev_priv->psr.enabled = intel_dp;
> +	dev_priv->psr.dp = intel_dp;

Now that there is psr.enabled, should we always keep this pointer
valid? 

>  
> -	intel_psr_activate(intel_dp);
> +	if (psr_global_enabled(dev_priv->psr.debugfs_mode))

Okay, now I see why you have psr_global_enabled() as the last check in
psr_compute_config().

> +		intel_psr_enable_locked(dev_priv, crtc_state);
>  
>  unlock:
>  	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
> @@ -688,7 +711,7 @@ static void intel_psr_disable_locked(struct
> intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	/* Disable PSR on Sink */
>  	drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_EN_CFG, 0);
>  
> -	dev_priv->psr.enabled = NULL;
> +	dev_priv->psr.enabled = false;
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -712,7 +735,14 @@ void intel_psr_disable(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp,
>  		return;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
> +	if (intel_dp != dev_priv->psr.dp) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>  	intel_psr_disable_locked(intel_dp);
> +
> +	dev_priv->psr.dp = NULL;
Is there still a need to use this field as flag?

>  	mutex_lunlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
>  	cancel_work_sync(&dev_priv->psr.work);
>  }
> @@ -756,13 +786,11 @@ int intel_psr_wait_for_idle(const struct
> intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state)
>  
>  static bool __psr_wait_for_idle_locked(struct drm_i915_private
> *dev_priv)
>  {
> -	struct intel_dp *intel_dp;
>  	i915_reg_t reg;
>  	u32 mask;
>  	int err;
>  
> -	intel_dp = dev_priv->psr.enabled;
> -	if (!intel_dp)
> +	if (!dev_priv->psr.enabled)
>  		return false;
>  
>  	if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled) {
> @@ -784,6 +812,89 @@ static bool __psr_wait_for_idle_locked(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	return err == 0 && dev_priv->psr.enabled;
>  }
>  
> +static struct drm_crtc *
> +find_idle_crtc_for_encoder(struct drm_encoder *encoder,
> +			   struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> +	struct drm_connector_list_iter conn_iter;
> +	struct drm_device *dev = encoder->dev;
> +	struct drm_connector *connector;
> +	struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> +	bool found = false;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	drm_connector_list_iter_begin(dev, &conn_iter);
> +	drm_for_each_connector_iter(connector, &conn_iter)
> +		if (connector->state->best_encoder == encoder) {
> +			found = true;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	drm_connector_list_iter_end(&conn_iter);
> +
> +	if (WARN_ON(!found))
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> +	crtc = connector->state->crtc;
> +	ret = drm_modeset_lock(&crtc->mutex, ctx);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +
> +	if (connector->state->commit)
> +		ret = wait_for_completion_interruptible(&connector-
> >state->commit->hw_done);
> +	if (!ret && crtc->state->commit)
> +		ret = wait_for_completion_interruptible(&crtc-
> >state->commit->hw_done);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +
> +	return crtc;
> +}
> +
> +int intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> +			       struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx *ctx,
> +			       enum i915_psr_debugfs_mode mode)
> +{
> +	struct drm_device *dev = &dev_priv->drm;
> +	struct drm_encoder *encoder;
> +	struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> +	int ret;
> +	bool enable;
> +
> +	ret = drm_modeset_lock(&dev->mode_config.connection_mutex,
> ctx);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	enable = psr_global_enabled(mode);
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
> +
> +	do {
> +		if (!dev_priv->psr.dp) {
> +			dev_priv->psr.debugfs_mode = mode;
> +			goto end;
> +		}
> +		encoder = &dp_to_dig_port(dev_priv->psr.dp)-
> >base.base;
> +		mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
> +
> +		crtc = find_idle_crtc_for_encoder(encoder, ctx);
> +		if (IS_ERR(crtc))
> +			return PTR_ERR(crtc);
> +
> +		mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
> +	} while (dev_priv->psr.dp != enc_to_intel_dp(encoder));
When will this not be true?

> +
> +	if (!enable)
> +		intel_psr_disable_locked(enc_to_intel_dp(encoder));
> +
> +	dev_priv->psr.debugfs_mode = mode;
> +
> +	if (enable)
bspec says PSR enable sequence requires ": The associated transcoder
and port are running and Aux channel associated with this port has IO
power enabled" Shouldn't crtc_state->active be checked.

> +		intel_psr_enable_locked(dev_priv,
> to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->state));
> +
> +end:
> +	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  static void intel_psr_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv =
> @@ -811,7 +922,8 @@ static void intel_psr_work(struct work_struct
> *work)
>  	if (dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits || dev_priv-
> >psr.active)
>  		goto unlock;
>  
> -	intel_psr_activate(dev_priv->psr.enabled);
> +	intel_psr_activate(dev_priv->psr.dp
> +);
Spurious new line.

>  unlock:
>  	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
>  }
> @@ -866,7 +978,7 @@ void intel_psr_invalidate(struct drm_i915_private
> *dev_priv,
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> -	crtc = dp_to_dig_port(dev_priv->psr.enabled)-
> >base.base.crtc;
> +	crtc = dp_to_dig_port(dev_priv->psr.dp)->base.base.crtc;
>  	pipe = to_intel_crtc(crtc)->pipe;
>  
>  	frontbuffer_bits &= INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_ALL_MASK(pipe);
> @@ -909,7 +1021,7 @@ void intel_psr_flush(struct drm_i915_private
> *dev_priv,
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> -	crtc = dp_to_dig_port(dev_priv->psr.enabled)-
> >base.base.crtc;
> +	crtc = dp_to_dig_port(dev_priv->psr.dp)->base.base.crtc;
>  	pipe = to_intel_crtc(crtc)->pipe;
>  
>  	frontbuffer_bits &= INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_ALL_MASK(pipe);
> @@ -971,6 +1083,8 @@ void intel_psr_init(struct drm_i915_private
> *dev_priv)
>  		/* For new platforms let's respect VBT back again */
>  		dev_priv->psr.link_standby = dev_priv-
> >vbt.psr.full_link;
>  
> +	dev_priv->psr.debugfs_mode = PSR_DEBUGFS_MODE_DEFAULT;
> +
>  	INIT_WORK(&dev_priv->psr.work, intel_psr_work);
>  	mutex_init(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
>  }
> @@ -991,7 +1105,7 @@ void intel_psr_short_pulse(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp)
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&psr->lock);
>  
> -	if (psr->enabled != intel_dp)
> +	if (!psr->enabled || psr->dp != intel_dp)
>  		goto exit;
>  
>  	if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_STATUS, &val)
> != 1) {


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list