[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [v6,1/6] drm/i915/guc: Avoid wasting memory on incorrect GuC pin bias
Bartminski, Jakub
jakub.bartminski at intel.com
Fri Jul 27 10:32:31 UTC 2018
On Fri, 2018-07-27 at 10:51 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Patchwork (2018-07-27 10:35:57)
> > == Series Details ==
> >
> > Series: series starting with [v6,1/6] drm/i915/guc: Avoid wasting
> > memory on incorrect GuC pin bias
> > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/47328/
> > State : failure
> >
> > == Summary ==
> >
> > = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4559 -> Patchwork_9788 =
> >
> > == Summary - FAILURE ==
> >
> > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_9788 absolutely
> > need to be
> > verified manually.
> >
> > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the
> > changes
> > introduced in Patchwork_9788, please notify your bug team to
> > allow them
> > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false
> > positives in CI.
> >
> > External URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/47
> > 328/revisions/1/mbox/
> >
> > == Possible new issues ==
> >
> > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
> > Patchwork_9788:
> >
> > === IGT changes ===
> >
> > ==== Possible regressions ====
> >
> > igt at drv_selftest@live_contexts:
> > {fi-skl-iommu}: PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
>
> Ok, just guc related explosions. Are you happy that these are the
> usual
> explosions? They do look like the usual fallout to me.
> -Chris
The series does not cause them, enabling the GuC does. We're not happy
that this happens, but it's unrelated to the assert failure, and thus
something to be fixed later on.
- Jakub
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3278 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20180727/46450f65/attachment.bin>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list