[Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v7] tests/kms_rotation_crc: Move platform checks to one place for non exhaust fence cases

Radhakrishna Sripada radhakrishna.sripada at intel.com
Fri Jul 27 22:26:13 UTC 2018


On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 03:06:19PM -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-07-27 at 13:43 -0700, Radhakrishna Sripada wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 08:26:06PM -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Mon, 2018-07-23 at 19:52 -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > On Mon, 2018-07-23 at 11:25 -0700, Radhakrishna Sripada wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > From: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa at intel.com>
> > > > > 
> > > > > Cleanup the testcases by moving the platform checks to a single
> > > > > function.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The earlier version of the path is posted here [1]
> > > > > 
> > > > > v2: Make use of the property enums to get the supported
> > > > > rotations
> > > > > v3: Move hardcodings to a single function(Ville)
> > > > > v4: Include the cherryview exception for reflect
> > > > > subtest(Maarten)
> > > > > v5: Rebase and move the check from CNL to ICL for reflect-x
> > > > > case
> > > > > v6: Fix the CI regression
> > > > > v7: rebase
> > > > > 
> > > > > [1]: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/209647/
> > > > > 
> > > > Oh well, I wrote my comments below and then read this link.
> > > > Please
> > > > add
> > > > new test requirements in separate patches. Only have the code
> > > > movement
> > > > here.
> > > > 
> > > Quoting Ville from [1] above
> > > 
> > > "Perhaps the best solution would be to make it as generic as
> > > possible
> > > by checking the plane supported rotations, while still keeoing the
> > > manual checks for the few exceptions I listed above. Might even be
> > > nice to put the generic stuff into something like
> > > igt_plane_has_rotation(). And maybe the exceptions should be there
> > > as well?"
> > > 
> > > If I am reading this correctly, this patch should have retained the
> > > plane property checks in addition to exceptions you have added.
> > Based on the feedback received from patch v2 [1], we moved back to
> > using
> > the platform checks instead of using the connector property.
> > 
> 
> Okay, I am not reading the comment, specifically "make it as generic as
> possible by checking the plane supported rotations", the way you are.
> Check with Ville.
Based on that feedback incorporated the changes in v3[2].
> 
> Anyway, if you want to add new platform checks, I do not recommend
> adding all of them in a single patch.
No new checks were added apart from the ones already supported by the driver.

> 
> 
> > 
> > [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/209647/
    [2] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/212409/

-RK
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -DK
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Cc: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada at intel.com>
> > > > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > > > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
> > > > > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
> > > > > Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola at intel.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa at intel.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada at intel
> > > > > .com
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  tests/kms_rotation_crc.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
> > > > > -----
> > > > >  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c
> > > > > b/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c
> > > > > index 6cb5858adb0f..f20b8a6d4ba1 100644
> > > > > --- a/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c
> > > > > +++ b/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c
> > > > > @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ typedef struct {
> > > > >  	uint32_t override_fmt;
> > > > >  	uint64_t override_tiling;
> > > > >  	int devid;
> > > > > +	int gen;
> > > > >  } data_t;
> > > > >  
> > > > >  typedef struct {
> > > > > @@ -284,6 +285,17 @@ static void prepare_fbs(data_t *data,
> > > > > igt_output_t *output,
> > > > >  		igt_plane_set_position(plane, data->pos_x,
> > > > > data-
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > pos_y);
> > > > >  }
> > > > >  
> > > > > +static void igt_check_rotation(data_t *data)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +	if (data->rotation & (IGT_ROTATION_90 |
> > > > > IGT_ROTATION_270))
> > > > > +		igt_require(data->gen >= 9);
> > > > > +	if (data->rotation & IGT_REFLECT_X)
> > > > > +		igt_require(data->gen >= 11 ||
> > > > This check used to be igt_require(gen >= 10
> > Will move it back to gen10.
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > +			    (IS_CHERRYVIEW(data->devid) &&
> > > > > (data-
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > rotation & IGT_ROTATION_0)));
> > > > There was also a check for tiling format 
> > > > -                                   (IS_CHERRYVIEW(data.devid) &&
> > > > reflect_x->rot == IGT_ROTATION_0
> > > > -                                    && reflect_x->tiling ==
> > > > LOCAL_I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED));
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > +	if (data->rotation & IGT_ROTATION_180)
> > > > > +		igt_require(data->gen >= 4);
> > > > Doesn't look like this requirement was is in the test earlier.
> > > > 
> > This is the requirement present in the kernel and got included here
> > on suggestion from here[1].
> > 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > >  static void test_single_case(data_t *data, enum pipe pipe,
> > > > >  			     igt_output_t *output, igt_plane_t
> > > > > *plane,
> > > > >  			     enum rectangle_type rect,
> > > > > @@ -352,15 +364,18 @@ static void test_plane_rotation(data_t
> > > > > *data,
> > > > > int plane_type, bool test_bad_form
> > > > >  
> > > > >  	igt_display_require_output(display);
> > > > >  
> > > > > +	igt_check_rotation(data);
> > > > > +
> > > > >  	for_each_pipe_with_valid_output(display, pipe, output)
> > > > > {
> > > > >  		igt_plane_t *plane;
> > > > >  		int i, j;
> > > > >  
> > > > > -		if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(data->devid) && pipe !=
> > > > > PIPE_B)
> > > > > -			continue;
> > > > > -
> > > > >  		igt_output_set_pipe(output, pipe);
> > > > >  
> > > > > +		if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(data->devid) && (data-
> > > > > >rotation
> > > > > &
> > > > > IGT_REFLECT_X) &&
> > > > > +		    pipe != kmstest_pipe_to_index('B'))
> > > > > +			continue;
> > > > > +
> > > > Why do this? 
> > > > 
> > On braswell reflectx is supported only on Pipe B and the test case
> > needs to be skipped for pipes A,C.
> > 
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Radhhakrishna(RK) Sripada
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > >  		plane = igt_output_get_plane_type(output,
> > > > > plane_type);
> > > > >  		igt_require(igt_plane_has_prop(plane,
> > > > > IGT_PLANE_ROTATION));
> > > > >  
> > > > > @@ -521,14 +536,13 @@ igt_main
> > > > >  	};
> > > > >  
> > > > >  	data_t data = {};
> > > > > -	int gen = 0;
> > > > >  
> > > > >  	igt_skip_on_simulation();
> > > > >  
> > > > >  	igt_fixture {
> > > > >  		data.gfx_fd =
> > > > > drm_open_driver_master(DRIVER_INTEL);
> > > > >  		data.devid = intel_get_drm_devid(data.gfx_fd);
> > > > > -		gen = intel_gen(data.devid);
> > > > > +		data.gen = intel_gen(data.devid);
> > > > >  
> > > > >  		kmstest_set_vt_graphics_mode();
> > > > >  
> > > > > @@ -541,16 +555,12 @@ igt_main
> > > > >  		igt_subtest_f("%s-rotation-%s",
> > > > >  			      plane_test_str(subtest->plane),
> > > > >  			      rot_test_str(subtest->rot)) {
> > > > > -			igt_require(!(subtest->rot &
> > > > > -				    (IGT_ROTATION_90 |
> > > > > IGT_ROTATION_270)) ||
> > > > > -				    gen >= 9);
> > > > >  			data.rotation = subtest->rot;
> > > > >  			test_plane_rotation(&data, subtest-
> > > > > >plane,
> > > > > false);
> > > > >  		}
> > > > >  	}
> > > > >  
> > > > >  	igt_subtest_f("sprite-rotation-90-pos-100-0") {
> > > > > -		igt_require(gen >= 9);
> > > > >  		data.rotation = IGT_ROTATION_90;
> > > > >  		data.pos_x = 100,
> > > > >  		data.pos_y = 0;
> > > > > @@ -560,7 +570,6 @@ igt_main
> > > > >  	data.pos_y = 0;
> > > > >  
> > > > >  	igt_subtest_f("bad-pixel-format") {
> > > > > -		igt_require(gen >= 9);
> > > > >  		data.rotation = IGT_ROTATION_90;
> > > > >  		data.override_fmt = DRM_FORMAT_RGB565;
> > > > >  		test_plane_rotation(&data,
> > > > > DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY,
> > > > > true);
> > > > > @@ -568,7 +577,6 @@ igt_main
> > > > >  	data.override_fmt = 0;
> > > > >  
> > > > >  	igt_subtest_f("bad-tiling") {
> > > > > -		igt_require(gen >= 9);
> > > > >  		data.rotation = IGT_ROTATION_90;
> > > > >  		data.override_tiling =
> > > > > LOCAL_I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED;
> > > > >  		test_plane_rotation(&data,
> > > > > DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY,
> > > > > true);
> > > > > @@ -579,9 +587,6 @@ igt_main
> > > > >  		igt_subtest_f("primary-%s-reflect-x-%s",
> > > > >  			      tiling_test_str(reflect_x-
> > > > > >tiling),
> > > > >  			      rot_test_str(reflect_x->rot)) {
> > > > > -			igt_require(gen >= 10 ||
> > > > > -				    (IS_CHERRYVIEW(data.devid)
> > > > > &&
> > > > > reflect_x->rot == IGT_ROTATION_0
> > > > > -				     && reflect_x->tiling ==
> > > > > LOCAL_I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED));
> > > > >  			data.rotation = (IGT_REFLECT_X |
> > > > > reflect_x-
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > rot);
> > > > >  			data.override_tiling = reflect_x-
> > > > > >tiling;
> > > > >  			test_plane_rotation(&data,
> > > > > DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY, false);
> > > > > @@ -596,7 +601,7 @@ igt_main
> > > > >  		enum pipe pipe;
> > > > >  		igt_output_t *output;
> > > > >  
> > > > > -		igt_require(gen >= 9);
> > > > > +		igt_require(data.gen >= 9);
> > > > >  		igt_display_require_output(&data.display);
> > > > >  
> > > > >  		for_each_pipe_with_valid_output(&data.display,
> > > > > pipe,
> > > > > output) {


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list