[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [01/20] drm/i915: Apply batch location restrictions before pinning

[Chris Wilson]

Quoting Patchwork (2018-06-07 15:12:34)
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: series starting with [01/20] drm/i915: Apply batch location restrictions before pinning
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/44393/
> State : failure
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4289_full -> Patchwork_9227_full =
> 
> == Summary - FAILURE ==
> 
>   Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_9227_full absolutely need to be
>   verified manually.
>   
>   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>   introduced in Patchwork_9227_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
>   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

The big change here that wasn't previous reported is:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_9227/pig-hsw-4770r/run0.log
No new failures. On previous runs there were GPU hangs. \o/

> == Possible new issues ==
> 
>   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_9227_full:
> 
>   === IGT changes ===
> 
>     ==== Possible regressions ====
> 
>     igt at drv_selftest@live_hangcheck:
>       shard-hsw:          PASS -> DMESG-FAIL

Still no better. Expected, but still disappointing.

>     igt at gem_exec_await@wide-all:
>       shard-hsw:          PASS -> FAIL (fdo#105900)
>       shard-glk:          PASS -> FAIL (fdo#105900)
>       shard-apl:          PASS -> FAIL (fdo#105900)
>       shard-kbl:          PASS -> FAIL (fdo#105900)

Hmm, looks I need to fix this igt (I probably said has_full_ppgtt in
calculating the number of requests/contexts I can use instead of
has_execlists).
-Chris