[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4] drm/i915/gen11: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists.
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com
Mon Jun 11 16:37:46 UTC 2018
On 25/05/18 11:26, Tomasz Lis wrote:
> The patch adds support of preempt-to-idle requesting by setting a proper
> bit within Execlist Control Register, and receiving preemption result from
> Context Status Buffer.
>
> Preemption in previous gens required a special batch buffer to be executed,
> so the Command Streamer never preempted to idle directly. In Icelake it is
> possible, as there is a hardware mechanism to inform the kernel about
> status of the preemption request.
>
> This patch does not cover using the new preemption mechanism when GuC is
> active.
>
> v2: Added needs_preempt_context() change so that it is not created when
> preempt-to-idle is supported. (Chris)
> Updated setting HWACK flag so that it is cleared after
> preempt-to-dle. (Chris, Daniele)
> Updated to use I915_ENGINE_HAS_PREEMPTION flag. (Chris)
>
> v3: Fixed needs_preempt_context() change. (Chris)
> Merged preemption trigger functions to one. (Chris)
> Fixed conyext state tonot assume COMPLETED_MASK after preemption,
> since idle-to-idle case will not have it set.
>
> v4: Simplified needs_preempt_context() change. (Daniele)
> Removed clearing HWACK flag in idle-to-idle preempt. (Daniele)
>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com>
> Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski at intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at intel.com>
> Bspec: 18922
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c | 3 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 3 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 113 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h | 1 +
> 6 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 487922f..35eddf7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -2534,6 +2534,8 @@ intel_info(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> ((dev_priv)->info.has_logical_ring_elsq)
> #define HAS_LOGICAL_RING_PREEMPTION(dev_priv) \
> ((dev_priv)->info.has_logical_ring_preemption)
> +#define HAS_HW_PREEMPT_TO_IDLE(dev_priv) \
> + ((dev_priv)->info.has_hw_preempt_to_idle)
>
> #define HAS_EXECLISTS(dev_priv) HAS_LOGICAL_RING_CONTEXTS(dev_priv)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
> index 45393f6..341a5ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
> @@ -455,7 +455,8 @@ destroy_kernel_context(struct i915_gem_context **ctxp)
>
> static bool needs_preempt_context(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> {
> - return HAS_LOGICAL_RING_PREEMPTION(i915);
> + return HAS_LOGICAL_RING_PREEMPTION(i915) &&
> + !HAS_HW_PREEMPT_TO_IDLE(i915);
> }
>
> int i915_gem_contexts_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> index 97a91e6a..ee09926 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> @@ -593,7 +593,8 @@ static const struct intel_device_info intel_cannonlake_info = {
> GEN(11), \
> .ddb_size = 2048, \
> .has_csr = 0, \
> - .has_logical_ring_elsq = 1
> + .has_logical_ring_elsq = 1, \
> + .has_hw_preempt_to_idle = 1
>
> static const struct intel_device_info intel_icelake_11_info = {
> GEN11_FEATURES,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> index 933e316..4eb97b5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ enum intel_platform {
> func(has_logical_ring_contexts); \
> func(has_logical_ring_elsq); \
> func(has_logical_ring_preemption); \
> + func(has_hw_preempt_to_idle); \
> func(has_overlay); \
> func(has_pooled_eu); \
> func(has_psr); \
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> index 8a6058b..f95cb37 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -154,6 +154,7 @@
> #define GEN8_CTX_STATUS_ACTIVE_IDLE (1 << 3)
> #define GEN8_CTX_STATUS_COMPLETE (1 << 4)
> #define GEN8_CTX_STATUS_LITE_RESTORE (1 << 15)
> +#define GEN11_CTX_STATUS_PREEMPT_IDLE (1 << 29)
>
> #define GEN8_CTX_STATUS_COMPLETED_MASK \
> (GEN8_CTX_STATUS_COMPLETE | GEN8_CTX_STATUS_PREEMPTED)
> @@ -522,31 +523,46 @@ static void port_assign(struct execlist_port *port, struct i915_request *rq)
> static void inject_preempt_context(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
continuing the discussion from the previous patch, I still think that we
should rename this function now that it doesn't inject a context on some
gens. A new function name should be relatively trivial to handle from
other patch series hitting the area (compared to having a second function).
> {
> struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists = &engine->execlists;
> - struct intel_context *ce =
> - to_intel_context(engine->i915->preempt_context, engine);
> - unsigned int n;
> -
> - GEM_BUG_ON(execlists->preempt_complete_status !=
> - upper_32_bits(ce->lrc_desc));
> - GEM_BUG_ON((ce->lrc_reg_state[CTX_CONTEXT_CONTROL + 1] &
> - _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(CTX_CTRL_ENGINE_CTX_RESTORE_INHIBIT |
> - CTX_CTRL_ENGINE_CTX_SAVE_INHIBIT)) !=
> - _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(CTX_CTRL_ENGINE_CTX_RESTORE_INHIBIT |
> - CTX_CTRL_ENGINE_CTX_SAVE_INHIBIT));
>
> - /*
> - * Switch to our empty preempt context so
> - * the state of the GPU is known (idle).
> - */
> GEM_TRACE("%s\n", engine->name);
> - for (n = execlists_num_ports(execlists); --n; )
> - write_desc(execlists, 0, n);
> + if (HAS_HW_PREEMPT_TO_IDLE(engine->i915)) {
> + /*
> + * hardware which HAS_HW_PREEMPT_TO_IDLE(), always also
> + * HAS_LOGICAL_RING_ELSQ(), so we can assume ctrl_reg is set
> + */
> + GEM_BUG_ON(execlists->ctrl_reg == NULL);
>
> - write_desc(execlists, ce->lrc_desc, n);
> + /*
> + * If we have hardware preempt-to-idle, we do not need to
> + * inject any job to the hardware. We only set a flag.
> + */
> + writel(EL_CTRL_PREEMPT_TO_IDLE, execlists->ctrl_reg);
> + } else {
> + struct intel_context *ce =
> + to_intel_context(engine->i915->preempt_context, engine);
> + unsigned int n;
>
> - /* we need to manually load the submit queue */
> - if (execlists->ctrl_reg)
> - writel(EL_CTRL_LOAD, execlists->ctrl_reg);
> + GEM_BUG_ON(execlists->preempt_complete_status !=
> + upper_32_bits(ce->lrc_desc));
> + GEM_BUG_ON((ce->lrc_reg_state[CTX_CONTEXT_CONTROL + 1] &
> + _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(CTX_CTRL_ENGINE_CTX_RESTORE_INHIBIT |
> + CTX_CTRL_ENGINE_CTX_SAVE_INHIBIT)) !=
> + _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(CTX_CTRL_ENGINE_CTX_RESTORE_INHIBIT |
> + CTX_CTRL_ENGINE_CTX_SAVE_INHIBIT));
> +
> + /*
> + * Switch to our empty preempt context so
> + * the state of the GPU is known (idle).
> + */
> + for (n = execlists_num_ports(execlists); --n; )
> + write_desc(execlists, 0, n);
> +
> + write_desc(execlists, ce->lrc_desc, n);
> +
> + /* we need to manually load the submit queue */
> + if (execlists->ctrl_reg)
> + writel(EL_CTRL_LOAD, execlists->ctrl_reg);
> + }
>
> execlists_clear_active(execlists, EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_HWACK);
> execlists_set_active(execlists, EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_PREEMPT);
> @@ -1031,22 +1047,48 @@ static void process_csb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> status, buf[2*head + 1],
> execlists->active);
>
> - if (status & (GEN8_CTX_STATUS_IDLE_ACTIVE |
> - GEN8_CTX_STATUS_PREEMPTED))
> - execlists_set_active(execlists,
> - EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_HWACK);
> - if (status & GEN8_CTX_STATUS_ACTIVE_IDLE)
> - execlists_clear_active(execlists,
> - EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_HWACK);
> + /*
> + * Check if preempted from idle to idle directly.
> + * The STATUS_IDLE_ACTIVE flag is used to mark
> + * such transition.
> + */
> + if ((status & GEN8_CTX_STATUS_IDLE_ACTIVE) &&
> + (status & GEN11_CTX_STATUS_PREEMPT_IDLE)) {
> +
> + /* Cannot be waiting for HWACK while HW is idle */
This comment does not match the check, since if the
EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_HWACK is set it means we've received the hw ack, not
that we're waiting for it. Personally I would just remove the BUG_ON
since we don't really care about the value of HWACK as long as
EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_PREEMPT is set, as the latter ensures us we're not
going to submit work until the whole preempt process is complete. A
BUG_ON for EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_PREEMPT is already in
complete_preempt_context so we're covered on that side.
With the 2 minor comments addressed:
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com>
Daniele
> + GEM_BUG_ON(execlists_is_active(execlists,
> + EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_HWACK));
>
> - if (!(status & GEN8_CTX_STATUS_COMPLETED_MASK))
> - continue;
> + /*
> + * We could not have COMPLETED anything
> + * if we were idle before preemption.
> + */
> + GEM_BUG_ON(status & GEN8_CTX_STATUS_COMPLETED_MASK);
> + } else {
> + if (status & (GEN8_CTX_STATUS_IDLE_ACTIVE |
> + GEN8_CTX_STATUS_PREEMPTED))
> + execlists_set_active(execlists,
> + EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_HWACK);
> +
> + if (status & GEN8_CTX_STATUS_ACTIVE_IDLE)
> + execlists_clear_active(execlists,
> + EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_HWACK);
> +
> + if (!(status & GEN8_CTX_STATUS_COMPLETED_MASK))
> + continue;
> +
> + /* We should never get a COMPLETED | IDLE_ACTIVE! */
> + GEM_BUG_ON(status & GEN8_CTX_STATUS_IDLE_ACTIVE);
> + }
>
> - /* We should never get a COMPLETED | IDLE_ACTIVE! */
> - GEM_BUG_ON(status & GEN8_CTX_STATUS_IDLE_ACTIVE);
>
> - if (status & GEN8_CTX_STATUS_COMPLETE &&
> - buf[2*head + 1] == execlists->preempt_complete_status) {
> + /*
> + * Check if preempted to real idle, either directly or
> + * the preemptive context already finished executing
> + */
> + if ((status & GEN11_CTX_STATUS_PREEMPT_IDLE) ||
> + (status & GEN8_CTX_STATUS_COMPLETE &&
> + buf[2*head + 1] == execlists->preempt_complete_status)) {
> GEM_TRACE("%s preempt-idle\n", engine->name);
> complete_preempt_context(execlists);
> continue;
> @@ -2337,7 +2379,8 @@ static void execlists_set_default_submission(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> engine->unpark = NULL;
>
> engine->flags |= I915_ENGINE_SUPPORTS_STATS;
> - if (engine->i915->preempt_context)
> + if (engine->i915->preempt_context ||
> + HAS_HW_PREEMPT_TO_IDLE(engine->i915))
> engine->flags |= I915_ENGINE_HAS_PREEMPTION;
>
> engine->i915->caps.scheduler =
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h
> index 1593194..3249e9b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
> #define RING_EXECLIST_SQ_CONTENTS(engine) _MMIO((engine)->mmio_base + 0x510)
> #define RING_EXECLIST_CONTROL(engine) _MMIO((engine)->mmio_base + 0x550)
> #define EL_CTRL_LOAD (1 << 0)
> +#define EL_CTRL_PREEMPT_TO_IDLE (1 << 1)
>
> /* The docs specify that the write pointer wraps around after 5h, "After status
> * is written out to the last available status QW at offset 5h, this pointer
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list