[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [v2,1/7] drm/i915/guc: Don't store runtime GuC log level in modparam (rev3)

[Chris Wilson]

Quoting Piorkowski, Piotr (2018-06-12 14:12:34)
> On Tue, 2018-06-05 at 21:56 +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> > == Series Details ==
> > 
> > Series: series starting with [v2,1/7] drm/i915/guc: Don't store
> > runtime GuC log level in modparam (rev3)
> > URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/44201/
> > State : failure
> > 
> > == Summary ==
> > 
> > = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4280_full -> Patchwork_9205_full =
> > 
> > == Summary - FAILURE ==
> > 
> >   Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_9205_full absolutely
> > need to be
> >   verified manually.
> >   
> >   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the
> > changes
> >   introduced in Patchwork_9205_full, please notify your bug team to
> > allow them
> >   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false
> > positives in CI.
> > 
> >   External URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/4420
> > 1/revisions/3/mbox/
> > 
> > == Possible new issues ==
> > 
> >   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
> > Patchwork_9205_full:
> > 
> >   === IGT changes ===
> > 
> >     ==== Possible regressions ====
> > 
> >     igt at drv_selftest@live_hangcheck:
> >       shard-kbl:          PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
> > 
> >     
> >     ==== Warnings ====
> > 
> >     igt at drv_selftest@live_guc:
> >       shard-kbl:          PASS -> SKIP +1
> > 
> 
> These negative results do not relate to my changes.

Applied, but note for the future, your authorname and s-o-b are not an
exact match. Please fix so that the scripts don't complain (and let's
hope upstream is also forgiving).
-Chris