[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: fix guest virtual PCH detection on non-PCH systems

Jani Nikula jani.nikula at intel.com
Wed Jun 13 06:49:09 UTC 2018


On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 5:34 AM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 31 May 2018, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 02:56:21PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> >> Virtualized non-PCH systems such as Broxton or Geminilake should use
>> >> PCH_NONE to indicate no PCH rather than PCH_NOP. The latter is a
>> >> specific case to indicate a PCH system without south display.
>> >
>> > Then let's go ahead and document it?
>>
>> Please avoid sending suggestion patches in-reply-to existing
>> series. This confused patchwork and screwed up CI for the series, which
>> was already a resend just to get CI. :(
>
> ugh, sorry.  Sometimes just adding a oneline diff is much better than
> a hundred words explaining :( ...

I feel you, a patch is more precise.

> IMO pw is trying to be smarter than it should here or not being smart
> enough. Nonetheless I won't do that anymore.

I think there were earlier complaints about what it did recognize and
what it didn't. I'd be open to only accepting new versions of patches
from whoever sent the original patch. Or requiring patch subjects don't
start with "Re:". Or both.

I was annoyed, but I'm perhaps more annoyed that you can't do this
without confusing patchwork. In the end, I wouldn't want to hamper
review by blocking something that comes naturally to people.

Arek?

BR,
Jani.




>
> Lucas De Marchi
>
>>
>> I'm resending the series, with your documentation patch added, but I'm
>> keeping the extra explanatory text in the last patch. I think it's
>> warranted.
>>
>> BR,
>> Jani.
>>
>>
>> >
>> > -------------
>> > Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: document PCH_NOP
>> >
>> > There's a difference between PCH_NONE and PCH_NOP: the former means we
>> > don't have a PCH while in the latter we do, but it doesn't have the
>> > south display.
>> >
>> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
>> > ---
>> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 +-
>> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> > index 72150f89f200..aa395a898258 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> > @@ -631,7 +631,7 @@ enum intel_pch {
>> >       PCH_KBP,        /* Kaby Lake PCH */
>> >       PCH_CNP,        /* Cannon Lake PCH */
>> >       PCH_ICP,        /* Ice Lake PCH */
>> > -     PCH_NOP,
>> > +     PCH_NOP,        /* PCH without south display */
>> >  };
>> >
>> >  enum intel_sbi_destination {
>>
>> --
>> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list