[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/24] drm/i915/icl: Add allowed DP rates for Icelake

[Manasi Navare]

On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 12:24:32PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 04:43:26PM -0700, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> > Em Sex, 2018-05-25 às 11:32 -0700, James Ausmus escreveu:
> > > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 04:42:37PM -0700, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> > > > From: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>
> > > > 
> > > > For ICL, on Combo PHY the allowed max rates are:
> > > >  - HBR3 8.1 eDP (DDIA)
> > > >  - HBR2 5.4 DisplayPort (DDIB)
> > > > and for MG PHY/TC DDI Ports allowed DP rates are:
> > > >  - HBR3 8.1 DisplayPort (DP alternate mode, DP over TBT,
> > > >  - DP on legacy connector - DDIC/D/E/F)
> > > > 
> > > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> > > > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at linux.intel.com>
> > > > Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus at intel.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: James Ausmus <james.ausmus at intel.com>
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: James Ausmus <james.ausmus at intel.com>
> > > 
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
> > > >  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > > index 5109023abe28..3ee8e74cf2b8 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > > @@ -419,6 +419,20 @@ static int cnl_max_source_rate(struct intel_dp
> > > > *intel_dp)
> > > >  	return 810000;
> > > >  }
> > > >  
> > > > +static int icl_max_source_rate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	struct intel_digital_port *dig_port =
> > > > dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> > > > +	enum port port = dig_port->base.port;
> > > > +
> > > > +	/* On Combo PHY port A max speed is HBR3 for all Vccio
> > > > voltages
> > > > +	 * and on Combo PHY Port B the maximum supported is HBR2.
> > > > +	 */
> > > > +	if (port == PORT_B)
> > > > +		return 540000;
> > > > +
> > > > +	return 810000;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > >  static void
> > > >  intel_dp_set_source_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > >  {
> > > > @@ -448,10 +462,13 @@ intel_dp_set_source_rates(struct intel_dp
> > > > *intel_dp)
> > > >  	/* This should only be done once */
> > > >  	WARN_ON(intel_dp->source_rates || intel_dp-
> > > > >num_source_rates);
> > > >  
> > > > -	if (IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv)) {
> > > > +	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10) {
> > > >  		source_rates = cnl_rates;
> > > >  		size = ARRAY_SIZE(cnl_rates);
> > > > -		max_rate = cnl_max_source_rate(intel_dp);
> > > > +		if (IS_ICELAKE(dev_priv))
> > > > +			max_rate = icl_max_source_rate(intel_dp);
> > > > +		else
> > > > +			max_rate = cnl_max_source_rate(intel_dp);
> > 
> > Bikeshed: changing this to "if (IS_CANNONLAKE())" would help ensuring
> > any possible future platform would be using the ICL table instead of
> > the CNL one.
> 
> I agree... but I'd prefer s/IS_ICELAKE/gen >= 11

Ok, so remove IS_CANNONLAKE and only have the code for Gen >=11 right?
So remove the cnl_max_source_rate also?

Regards
Manasi

> 
> > 
> > 
> > > >  	} else if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv)) {
> > > >  		source_rates = bxt_rates;
> > > >  		size = ARRAY_SIZE(bxt_rates);
> > > > -- 
> > > > 2.14.3
> > > > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx