[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 5/5] drm/i915/psr/bdw+: Enable CRC check in the static frame on the sink side

Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Fri Jun 15 05:14:23 UTC 2018


On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 05:02:41PM -0700, Souza, Jose wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-06-14 at 14:19 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 01:34:33PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza
> > wrote:
> > > Sink can be configured to calculate the CRC over the static frame
> > > and
> > > compare with the CRC calculated and transmited in the VSC SDP by
> > > source, if there is a mismatch sink will do a short pulse in HPD
> > > and set DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR in DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS.
> > > 
> > > Spec: 7723
> > > 
> > > v4:
> > > patch moved to after 'drm/i915/psr: Avoid PSR exit max time
> > > timeout'
> > > to avoid touch in 2 patches EDP_PSR_DEBUG.
> > > 
> > > v3:
> > > disabling PSR instead of exiting on error
> > > 
> > > Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com>
> > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h  |  1 +
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
> > >  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > index 140f6a27d696..ed34ccd81c7c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > @@ -4038,6 +4038,7 @@ enum {
> > >  #define   EDP_PSR_SKIP_AUX_EXIT			(1<<12)
> > >  #define   EDP_PSR_TP1_TP2_SEL			(0<<11)
> > >  #define   EDP_PSR_TP1_TP3_SEL			(1<<11)
> > > +#define   EDP_PSR_CRC_ENABLE			(1<<10) /*
> > > BDW+ */
> > >  #define   EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_500us		(0<<8)
> > >  #define   EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_100us		(1<<8)
> > >  #define   EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_2500us		(2<<8)
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > > index 177cd57b1029..cf72b79caf3f 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > > @@ -360,6 +360,8 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_sink(struct intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp)
> > >  
> > >  	if (dev_priv->psr.link_standby)
> > >  		dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_MAIN_LINK_ACTIVE;
> > > +	if (!dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled && INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >=
> > > 8)
> > > +		dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_CRC_VERIFICATION;
> > >  	drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_EN_CFG,
> > > dpcd_val);
> > >  
> > >  	drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_SET_POWER,
> > > DP_SET_POWER_D0);
> > > @@ -415,6 +417,9 @@ static void hsw_activate_psr1(struct intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp)
> > >  	else
> > >  		val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TP2_SEL;
> > >  
> > > +	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8)
> > > +		val |= EDP_PSR_CRC_ENABLE;
> > > +
> > >  	val |= I915_READ(EDP_PSR_CTL) &
> > > EDP_PSR_RESTORE_PSR_ACTIVE_CTX_MASK;
> > >  	I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_CTL, val);
> > >  }
> > > @@ -1032,16 +1037,19 @@ void intel_psr_short_pulse(struct intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp)
> > >  		goto exit;
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > > -	if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR) {
> > > -		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR RFB storage error, exiting
> > > PSR\n");
> > > +	if (val & (DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR |
> > > DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)) {
> > > +		if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR)
> > 
> > I believe we can avoid the duplication of the conditions here...
> > maybe with:
> > if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR)
> > //msg
> > else if (val & DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)
> > //msg
> > else
> > goto clear
> 
> Well val can have all 3 errors set, so it would only print the first
> debug message but I got your point, I will change to:
> 
> if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR)
> //msg
> if (val & DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)
> //msg
> ...
> 
> if (val)
> 	intel_psr_disable_locked()
> 
> as right all errors are unrecovered. This sounds good?

cool, better than my goto idea ;)

> 
> 
> > 
> > intel_psr_disable_locked()
> > 
> > > +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR RFB storage error,
> > > disabling PSR\n");
> > > +		if (val & DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)
> > > +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR Link CRC error,
> > > disabling PSR\n");
> > >  		psr_disable(intel_dp);
> > >  	}
> > > -	if (val & (DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR |
> > > DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR))
> > > +	if (val & DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR)
> > >  		DRM_ERROR("PSR_ERROR_STATUS not handled %x\n",
> > > val);
> > 
> > clear:
> > >  	/* clear status register */
> > >  	drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS,
> > > val);
> > >  
> > > -	/* TODO: handle other PSR/PSR2 errors */
> > > +	/* TODO: handle PSR2 errors */
> > >  exit:
> > >  	mutex_unlock(&psr->lock);
> > >  }
> > > -- 
> > > 2.17.1
> > > 


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list