[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Enable provoking vertex fix on Gen9+ systems.

[Chris Wilson]

Quoting Chris Wilson (2018-06-15 08:16:01)
> Quoting Patchwork (2018-06-14 23:53:30)
> > == Series Details ==
> > 
> > Series: drm/i915: Enable provoking vertex fix on Gen9+ systems.
> > URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/44781/
> > State : failure
> > 
> > == Summary ==
> > 
> > = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4322 -> Patchwork_9312 =
> > 
> > == Summary - FAILURE ==
> > 
> >   Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_9312 absolutely need to be
> >   verified manually.
> >   
> >   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> >   introduced in Patchwork_9312, please notify your bug team to allow them
> >   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> > 
> >   External URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/44781/revisions/1/mbox/
> > 
> > == Possible new issues ==
> > 
> >   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_9312:
> > 
> >   === IGT changes ===
> > 
> >     ==== Possible regressions ====
> > 
> >     igt at gem_workarounds@basic-read:
> >       fi-skl-6260u:       PASS -> FAIL
> >       fi-cfl-s3:          PASS -> FAIL
> >       fi-skl-6700k2:      PASS -> FAIL
> >       fi-skl-6770hq:      PASS -> FAIL
> >       fi-kbl-7560u:       PASS -> FAIL
> >       fi-skl-6600u:       PASS -> FAIL
> >       fi-bxt-dsi:         PASS -> FAIL
> >       fi-kbl-guc:         PASS -> FAIL
> >       fi-kbl-7500u:       PASS -> FAIL
> >       fi-skl-6700hq:      PASS -> FAIL
> >       fi-bxt-j4205:       PASS -> FAIL
> >       fi-skl-gvtdvm:      PASS -> FAIL
> >       fi-cfl-guc:         PASS -> FAIL
> >       {fi-whl-u}:         PASS -> FAIL
> >       fi-cfl-8700k:       PASS -> FAIL
> >       fi-glk-j4005:       PASS -> FAIL
> >       fi-skl-guc:         PASS -> FAIL
> >       fi-kbl-7567u:       PASS -> FAIL
> >       fi-kbl-r:           PASS -> FAIL
> 
> (gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: Address   val             mask            read            result
> (gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x07014   0x20002000      0x00002000      0x00002000      OK
> (gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x0E194   0x01000100      0x00000100      0x00000114      OK
> (gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x0E4F0   0x81008100      0x00008100      0xFFFF8120      OK
> (gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x0E184   0x00200020      0x00000020      0x00000022      OK
> (gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x0E194   0x00140014      0x00000014      0x00000114      OK
> (gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x07004   0x00420042      0x00000042      0x000029C2      OK
> (gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x0E188   0x00080000      0x00000008      0x00008030      OK
> (gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x07300   0x80208020      0x00008020      0x00008830      OK
> (gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x07300   0x00100010      0x00000010      0x00008830      OK
> (gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x0E184   0x00020002      0x00000002      0x00000022      OK
> (gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x0E180   0x20002000      0x00002000      0x00002000      OK
> (gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x02580   0x00010000      0x00000001      0x00000004      OK
> (gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x02580   0x00060004      0x00000006      0x00000004      OK
> (gem_workarounds:3828) WARNING: 0x02088 0x00020002      0x00000002      0x00000000      FAIL
> (gem_workarounds:3828) WARNING: 0x02090 0x10001000      0x00001000      0x00000000      FAIL
> 
> The 2 writes didn't stick. Not context saved? Or something even more
> peculiar?

More sinister. The LRI never expected so many registers!
-Chris