[Intel-gfx] [DIM DOCS PATCH 2/2] doc: clarify what type of changes are acceptable at commit time
Daniel Vetter
daniel at ffwll.ch
Wed Jun 27 17:10:46 UTC 2018
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 5:13 PM, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com> wrote:
> As a rule of thumb, don't change patches while committing.
>
> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> ---
> drm-intel.rst | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drm-intel.rst b/drm-intel.rst
> index baf48f459dd9..ad8ff9739336 100644
> --- a/drm-intel.rst
> +++ b/drm-intel.rst
> @@ -196,6 +196,13 @@ An inexhaustive list of details to check:
> coordinate with maintainers to avoid unnecessary pain with conflicts. Usually
> some explicit merges are needed to avoid git getting lost.
>
> +* As a general rule, do not modify the patches while applying, apart from the
> + commit message. If the patch conflicts, or needs to be changed due to review,
> + have the author rebase, update and resend. Any change at this stage is a
> + potential issue bypassing CI.
>
Should we also mention that merge conflicts need to be told to
maintainers, so that they can do a backmerge? Just because this blew
up recently for drm-misc ...
-Daniel
> + At most, minor comment and whitespace tweaks are acceptable.
> +
> On Confidence, Complexity, and Transparency
> -------------------------------------------
>
> --
> 2.11.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> dim-tools mailing list
> dim-tools at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dim-tools
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list