[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [v3,1/3] drm/i915/guc: Use intel_guc_init_misc to hide GuC internals

[Chris Wilson]

Quoting Michal Wajdeczko (2018-06-28 22:19:31)
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 20:20:11 +0200, Patchwork  
> <patchwork at emeril.freedesktop.org> wrote:
> 
> > == Series Details ==
> >
> > Series: series starting with [v3,1/3] drm/i915/guc: Use  
> > intel_guc_init_misc to hide GuC internals
> > URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/45593/
> > State : failure
> >
> > == Summary ==
> >
> > = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4397_full -> Patchwork_9474_full =
> >
> > == Summary - FAILURE ==
> >
> >   Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_9474_full absolutely  
> > need to be
> >   verified manually.
> >  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> >   introduced in Patchwork_9474_full, please notify your bug team to  
> > allow them
> >   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives  
> > in CI.
> >
> >
> > == Possible new issues ==
> >
> >   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in  
> > Patchwork_9474_full:
> >
> >   === IGT changes ===
> >
> >     ==== Possible regressions ====
> >
> >     igt at drv_selftest@mock_contexts:
> >       shard-apl:          PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
> >       shard-kbl:          PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
> >       shard-snb:          PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
> >       shard-hsw:          PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
> >       shard-glk:          PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
> >
> >     igt at pm_rpm@debugfs-read:
> >       shard-kbl:          PASS -> DMESG-WARN +3
> >
> 
> all these issues are the same as with HAX alone - see [1]

And still waiting for the fix ;)
-Chris