[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/37] drm/i915: Export i915_request_skip()
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Fri Jun 29 12:10:32 UTC 2018
On 29/06/2018 08:53, Chris Wilson wrote:
> In the next patch, we will want to start skipping requests on failing to
> complete their payloads. So export the utility function current used to
> make requests inoperable following a failed gpu reset.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 25 +++----------------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index c13d5b78a02e..8ae293c75ae9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -3084,25 +3084,6 @@ int i915_gem_reset_prepare(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> return err;
> }
>
> -static void skip_request(struct i915_request *request)
> -{
> - void *vaddr = request->ring->vaddr;
> - u32 head;
> -
> - /* As this request likely depends on state from the lost
> - * context, clear out all the user operations leaving the
> - * breadcrumb at the end (so we get the fence notifications).
> - */
> - head = request->head;
> - if (request->postfix < head) {
> - memset(vaddr + head, 0, request->ring->size - head);
> - head = 0;
> - }
> - memset(vaddr + head, 0, request->postfix - head);
> -
> - dma_fence_set_error(&request->fence, -EIO);
> -}
> -
> static void engine_skip_context(struct i915_request *request)
> {
> struct intel_engine_cs *engine = request->engine;
> @@ -3117,10 +3098,10 @@ static void engine_skip_context(struct i915_request *request)
>
> list_for_each_entry_continue(request, &engine->timeline.requests, link)
> if (request->gem_context == hung_ctx)
> - skip_request(request);
> + i915_request_skip(request, -EIO);
>
> list_for_each_entry(request, &timeline->requests, link)
> - skip_request(request);
> + i915_request_skip(request, -EIO);
>
> spin_unlock(&timeline->lock);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&engine->timeline.lock, flags);
> @@ -3163,7 +3144,7 @@ i915_gem_reset_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
>
> if (stalled) {
> i915_gem_context_mark_guilty(request->gem_context);
> - skip_request(request);
> + i915_request_skip(request, -EIO);
>
> /* If this context is now banned, skip all pending requests. */
> if (i915_gem_context_is_banned(request->gem_context))
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
> index d618e7127e88..51f28786b0e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
> @@ -962,6 +962,27 @@ i915_request_await_object(struct i915_request *to,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +void i915_request_skip(struct i915_request *rq, int error)
> +{
> + void *vaddr = rq->ring->vaddr;
> + u32 head;
> +
> + GEM_BUG_ON(!IS_ERR_VALUE((long)error));
Why not simply error >= 0 ? Error is an integer in this function, and in
dma_fence_set_error. In fact, looking at dma_fence_set_error it is
already checking for valid errno.
> + dma_fence_set_error(&rq->fence, error);
Was at the end before code movement.
> +
> + /*
> + * As this request likely depends on state from the lost
> + * context, clear out all the user operations leaving the
> + * breadcrumb at the end (so we get the fence notifications).
> + */
> + head = rq->infix;
Original assignment is head = rq->head. Looks to be the same but why
change it in code movement patch?
> + if (rq->postfix < head) {
> + memset(vaddr + head, 0, rq->ring->size - head);
> + head = 0;
> + }
> + memset(vaddr + head, 0, rq->postfix - head);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * NB: This function is not allowed to fail. Doing so would mean the the
> * request is not being tracked for completion but the work itself is
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h
> index 7ee220ded9c9..a355a081485f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h
> @@ -258,6 +258,8 @@ void i915_request_add(struct i915_request *rq);
> void __i915_request_submit(struct i915_request *request);
> void i915_request_submit(struct i915_request *request);
>
> +void i915_request_skip(struct i915_request *request, int error);
> +
> void __i915_request_unsubmit(struct i915_request *request);
> void i915_request_unsubmit(struct i915_request *request);
>
>
Regards,
Tvrtko
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list