[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/i915/guc: Print CTL params passed to Guc

Michal Wajdeczko michal.wajdeczko at intel.com
Fri Jun 29 13:55:24 UTC 2018


On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 18:25:21 +0200, Patchwork  
<patchwork at emeril.freedesktop.org> wrote:

> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/i915/guc: Print CTL params  
> passed to Guc
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/44934/
> State : failure
>
> == Summary ==
>
> = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4334_full -> Patchwork_9351_full =
>
> == Summary - FAILURE ==
>
>   Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_9351_full absolutely  
> need to be
>   verified manually.
>  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>   introduced in Patchwork_9351_full, please notify your bug team to  
> allow them
>   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives  
> in CI.
>
>
> == Possible new issues ==
>
>   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in  
> Patchwork_9351_full:
>
>   === IGT changes ===
>
>     ==== Possible regressions ====
>
>     igt at drv_selftest@mock_contexts:
>       shard-apl:          PASS -> DMESG-FAIL +1
>       shard-kbl:          PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
>       shard-snb:          PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
>       shard-hsw:          PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
>       shard-glk:          PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
>
>     igt at gem_exec_capture@capture-render:
>       shard-kbl:          PASS -> DMESG-WARN +3
>
>     igt at pm_rpm@debugfs-read:
>       shard-apl:          PASS -> DMESG-WARN
>

again, all these issues are the same as with HAX alone - see [1]

[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/40112/

Michal


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list