[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/i915/guc: Print CTL params passed to Guc
Michal Wajdeczko
michal.wajdeczko at intel.com
Fri Jun 29 13:55:24 UTC 2018
On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 18:25:21 +0200, Patchwork
<patchwork at emeril.freedesktop.org> wrote:
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/i915/guc: Print CTL params
> passed to Guc
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/44934/
> State : failure
>
> == Summary ==
>
> = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4334_full -> Patchwork_9351_full =
>
> == Summary - FAILURE ==
>
> Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_9351_full absolutely
> need to be
> verified manually.
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in Patchwork_9351_full, please notify your bug team to
> allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives
> in CI.
>
>
> == Possible new issues ==
>
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
> Patchwork_9351_full:
>
> === IGT changes ===
>
> ==== Possible regressions ====
>
> igt at drv_selftest@mock_contexts:
> shard-apl: PASS -> DMESG-FAIL +1
> shard-kbl: PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
> shard-snb: PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
> shard-hsw: PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
> shard-glk: PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
>
> igt at gem_exec_capture@capture-render:
> shard-kbl: PASS -> DMESG-WARN +3
>
> igt at pm_rpm@debugfs-read:
> shard-apl: PASS -> DMESG-WARN
>
again, all these issues are the same as with HAX alone - see [1]
[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/40112/
Michal
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list