[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/trace: Remove engine out of the context sandwich

[Chris Wilson]

Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-05-24 16:48:45)
> 
> On 24/05/2018 16:33, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > But what we call ctx here isn't really context, but timeline; how about
> > if we switch to the fence=%llx:%d representation we've mostly settled on
> > for the debug messages?
> 
> For the ctx and seqno pair? But here we have the additional issue of 
> hw_id. I think context is better than timeline at this level.
> 
> Or you mean keep explicit hw_id and join ctx and seqno into fence=%llx:%d?

Right. I think what we call ctx here is very confusing, as it's just the
fence.context (i.e timeline id) and not any of the ids we assign to the
context (neither hw_id or uabi_id), so I don't think ctx refers to
i915_gem_context/intel_context at all and so would rather stop using
'ctx'.

Pardon the rambling, 
-Chris