[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/trace: Remove engine out of the context sandwich

Tvrtko Ursulin tursulin at ursulin.net
Fri May 25 08:26:41 UTC 2018


From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>

In the string tracepoint representation we ended up with the engine
sandwiched between context hardware id and context fence id.

Move the two pieces of context data together for redability.

Binary records are left as is, that is both fields remaing under the
existing name and ordering.

v2:
 * Do not consolidate the printk format, just reorder. (Lionel)

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
index 7acea4052798..bac582ed3a0b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
@@ -638,9 +638,9 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_request_queue,
 			   __entry->flags = flags;
 			   ),
 
-	    TP_printk("dev=%u, hw_id=%u, engine=%u:%u, ctx=%u, seqno=%u, flags=0x%x",
-		      __entry->dev, __entry->hw_id, __entry->class,
-		      __entry->instance, __entry->ctx, __entry->seqno,
+	    TP_printk("dev=%u, engine=%u:%u, hw_id=%u, ctx=%u, seqno=%u, flags=0x%x",
+		      __entry->dev, __entry->class, __entry->instance,
+		      __entry->hw_id, __entry->ctx, __entry->seqno,
 		      __entry->flags)
 );
 
@@ -668,9 +668,9 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(i915_request,
 			   __entry->global = rq->global_seqno;
 			   ),
 
-	    TP_printk("dev=%u, hw_id=%u, engine=%u:%u, ctx=%u, seqno=%u, global=%u",
-		      __entry->dev, __entry->hw_id, __entry->class,
-		      __entry->instance, __entry->ctx, __entry->seqno,
+	    TP_printk("dev=%u, engine=%u:%u, hw_id=%u, ctx=%u, seqno=%u, global=%u",
+		      __entry->dev, __entry->class, __entry->instance,
+		      __entry->hw_id, __entry->ctx, __entry->seqno,
 		      __entry->global)
 );
 
@@ -718,9 +718,9 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_request_in,
 			   __entry->port = port;
 			   ),
 
-	    TP_printk("dev=%u, hw_id=%u, engine=%u:%u, ctx=%u, seqno=%u, prio=%u, global=%u, port=%u",
-		      __entry->dev, __entry->hw_id, __entry->class,
-		      __entry->instance, __entry->ctx, __entry->seqno,
+	    TP_printk("dev=%u, engine=%u:%u, hw_id=%u, ctx=%u, seqno=%u, prio=%u, global=%u, port=%u",
+		      __entry->dev, __entry->class, __entry->instance,
+		      __entry->hw_id, __entry->ctx, __entry->seqno,
 		      __entry->prio, __entry->global_seqno, __entry->port)
 );
 
@@ -750,9 +750,9 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_request_out,
 			   __entry->completed = i915_request_completed(rq);
 			   ),
 
-		    TP_printk("dev=%u, hw_id=%u, engine=%u:%u, ctx=%u, seqno=%u, global=%u, completed?=%u",
-			      __entry->dev, __entry->hw_id, __entry->class,
-			      __entry->instance, __entry->ctx, __entry->seqno,
+		    TP_printk("dev=%u, engine=%u:%u, hw_id=%u, ctx=%u, seqno=%u, global=%u, completed?=%u",
+			      __entry->dev, __entry->class, __entry->instance,
+			      __entry->hw_id, __entry->ctx, __entry->seqno,
 			      __entry->global_seqno, __entry->completed)
 );
 
@@ -842,9 +842,9 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_request_wait_begin,
 			   __entry->flags = flags;
 			   ),
 
-	    TP_printk("dev=%u, hw_id=%u, engine=%u:%u, ctx=%u, seqno=%u, global=%u, blocking=%u, flags=0x%x",
-		      __entry->dev, __entry->hw_id, __entry->class,
-		      __entry->instance, __entry->ctx, __entry->seqno,
+	    TP_printk("dev=%u, engine=%u:%u, hw_id=%u, ctx=%u, seqno=%u, global=%u, blocking=%u, flags=0x%x",
+		      __entry->dev, __entry->class, __entry->instance,
+		      __entry->hw_id, __entry->ctx, __entry->seqno,
 		      __entry->global, !!(__entry->flags & I915_WAIT_LOCKED),
 		      __entry->flags)
 );
-- 
2.17.0



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list