[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915 : clip yuv primary planes to hw constraints

Fritz Koenig frkoenig at google.com
Fri May 25 20:48:32 UTC 2018


On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 11:12 AM Ville Syrjälä <
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:

> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 11:00:23AM -0700, Fritz Koenig wrote:
> > YUV planes need to be multiples of 2 to scan out. This was
> > handled correctly for planes other than the primary in the
> > intel_check_sprite_plane, where the code fixes up the plane
> > and makes it compliant. Move this code into a location that
> > allows the primary check to access it as well.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fritz Koenig <frkoenig at google.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think this is a better implementation where instead of rejecting
> > yuv planes that are not correctly aligned, they are fixed up.  This
> > is done by reusing the sprite check code that was already doing that.
> >
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h     |   2 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c  | 154 +-----------------------
> >  3 files changed, 175 insertions(+), 151 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > index 56004ffbd8bb..1328fb90367f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > @@ -12854,6 +12854,170 @@ skl_max_scale(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state
> >       return max_scale;
> >  }
> >
> > +int
> > +intel_clip_src_rect(struct intel_plane *plane,
> > +                 struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> > +                 struct intel_plane_state *state)
> > +{
> > +     struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(plane->base.dev);
> > +     struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->base.crtc);
> > +     struct drm_framebuffer *fb = state->base.fb;
> > +     int crtc_x, crtc_y;
> > +     unsigned int crtc_w, crtc_h;
> > +     uint32_t src_x, src_y, src_w, src_h;
> > +     struct drm_rect *src = &state->base.src;
> > +     struct drm_rect *dst = &state->base.dst;
> > +     struct drm_rect clip = {};
> > +     int hscale, vscale;
> > +     int max_scale, min_scale;
> > +     bool can_scale;
> > +
> > +     *src = drm_plane_state_src(&state->base);
> > +     *dst = drm_plane_state_dest(&state->base);
> > +
> > +     /* setup can_scale, min_scale, max_scale */
> > +     if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9) {
> > +             /* use scaler when colorkey is not required */
> > +             if (!state->ckey.flags) {
> > +                     can_scale = 1;
> > +                     min_scale = 1;
> > +                     max_scale = skl_max_scale(crtc, crtc_state);
> > +             } else {
> > +                     can_scale = 0;
> > +                     min_scale = DRM_PLANE_HELPER_NO_SCALING;
> > +                     max_scale = DRM_PLANE_HELPER_NO_SCALING;
> > +             }
> > +     } else {
> > +             can_scale = plane->can_scale;
> > +             max_scale = plane->max_downscale << 16;
> > +             min_scale = plane->can_scale ? 1 : (1 << 16);
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     /*
> > +      * FIXME the following code does a bunch of fuzzy adjustments to
the
> > +      * coordinates and sizes. We probably need some way to decide
whether
> > +      * more strict checking should be done instead.
> > +      */
> > +     drm_rect_rotate(src, fb->width << 16, fb->height << 16,
> > +                     state->base.rotation);
> > +
> > +     hscale = drm_rect_calc_hscale_relaxed(src, dst, min_scale,
max_scale);
> > +     BUG_ON(hscale < 0);
> > +
> > +     vscale = drm_rect_calc_vscale_relaxed(src, dst, min_scale,
max_scale);
> > +     BUG_ON(vscale < 0);

> Your baseline is already outdated.


Sorry, I was on the incorrect branch.

I tried to retarget at drm-intel-fixes, but this still appears to be
incorrect as it is still failing to patch.  Should I be targeting
drm-intel-next instead?

> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list