[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: merge gen checks to use range

Tvrtko Ursulin tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Thu Nov 1 11:31:25 UTC 2018


On 01/11/2018 08:35, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> Instead of using several IS_GEN(), it's possible to pass the
> range as argument. By code inspection these were the ranges deemed
> necessary for spatch:
> 
> @@
> expression e;
> @@
> (
> - IS_GEN(e, 3) || IS_GEN(e, 4)
> + IS_GEN(e, 3, 4)
> |
> - IS_GEN(e, 5) || IS_GEN(e, 6)
> + IS_GEN(e, 5, 6)
> |
> - IS_GEN(e, 6) || IS_GEN(e, 7)
> + IS_GEN(e, 6, 7)
> |
> - IS_GEN(e, 7) || IS_GEN(e, 8)
> + IS_GEN(e, 7, 8)
> |
> - IS_GEN(e, 8) || IS_GEN(e, 9)
> + IS_GEN(e, 8, 9)
> |
> - IS_GEN(e, 10) || IS_GEN(e, 9)
> + IS_GEN(e, 9, 10)
> |
> - IS_GEN(e, 9) || IS_GEN(e, 10)
> + IS_GEN(e, 9, 10)
> )
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c        | 6 +++---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c      | 2 +-
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c           | 2 +-
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c           | 2 +-
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c   | 2 +-
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c       | 2 +-
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c     | 2 +-
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c | 2 +-
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pipe_crc.c      | 4 ++--
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c        | 6 +++---
>   10 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index 28d95f9d0b0e..f2fbc016bd7f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -2030,7 +2030,7 @@ static int i915_swizzle_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>   	seq_printf(m, "bit6 swizzle for Y-tiling = %s\n",
>   		   swizzle_string(dev_priv->mm.bit_6_swizzle_y));
>   
> -	if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 3) || IS_GEN(dev_priv, 4)) {
> +	if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 3, 4)) {

I can see value in it but think it would read better with IS_GEN_RANGE.

Are there any cases of or-ed IS_GEN checks with something sandwiched in 
between then, which the above spatch would miss?

How many non-consecutive IS_GEN gen checks are there? To give us some 
ideas if the usual pattern is range, or perhaps checks against a list of 
gens also exists? (Gut feeling says no.)

Regards,

Tvrtko

>   		seq_printf(m, "DDC = 0x%08x\n",
>   			   I915_READ(DCC));
>   		seq_printf(m, "DDC2 = 0x%08x\n",
> @@ -4260,7 +4260,7 @@ i915_cache_sharing_get(void *data, u64 *val)
>   	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = data;
>   	u32 snpcr;
>   
> -	if (!(IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6) || IS_GEN(dev_priv, 7)))
> +	if (!(IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6, 7)))
>   		return -ENODEV;
>   
>   	intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
> @@ -4280,7 +4280,7 @@ i915_cache_sharing_set(void *data, u64 val)
>   	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = data;
>   	u32 snpcr;
>   
> -	if (!(IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6) || IS_GEN(dev_priv, 7)))
> +	if (!(IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6, 7)))
>   		return -ENODEV;
>   
>   	if (val > 3)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> index c9f8aa47005a..969691e50c04 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> @@ -1673,7 +1673,7 @@ static void capture_reg_state(struct i915_gpu_state *error)
>   		error->ccid = I915_READ(CCID);
>   
>   	/* 3: Feature specific registers */
> -	if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6) || IS_GEN(dev_priv, 7)) {
> +	if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6, 7)) {
>   		error->gam_ecochk = I915_READ(GAM_ECOCHK);
>   		error->gac_eco = I915_READ(GAC_ECO_BITS);
>   	}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> index 92daddf79cb0..baaa7b70ffa0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> @@ -3449,7 +3449,7 @@ void i915_perf_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>   		dev_priv->perf.oa.ops.read = gen8_oa_read;
>   		dev_priv->perf.oa.ops.oa_hw_tail_read = gen8_oa_hw_tail_read;
>   
> -		if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 8) || IS_GEN(dev_priv, 9)) {
> +		if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 8, 9)) {
>   			dev_priv->perf.oa.ops.is_valid_b_counter_reg =
>   				gen7_is_valid_b_counter_addr;
>   			dev_priv->perf.oa.ops.is_valid_mux_reg =
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c
> index bf4fd739b68c..1822dccb1914 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c
> @@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ intel_crt_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *connector,
>   		 * DAC limit supposedly 355 MHz.
>   		 */
>   		max_clock = 270000;
> -	else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 3) || IS_GEN(dev_priv, 4))
> +	else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 3, 4))
>   		max_clock = 400000;
>   	else
>   		max_clock = 350000;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> index 873f37b7b796..a1b046c322d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> @@ -783,7 +783,7 @@ void intel_device_info_runtime_init(struct intel_device_info *info)
>   		DRM_INFO("Display disabled (module parameter)\n");
>   		info->num_pipes = 0;
>   	} else if (info->num_pipes > 0 &&
> -		   (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 7) || IS_GEN(dev_priv, 8)) &&
> +		   (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 7, 8)) &&
>   		   HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv)) {
>   		u32 fuse_strap = I915_READ(FUSE_STRAP);
>   		u32 sfuse_strap = I915_READ(SFUSE_STRAP);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 84c432cbdf5b..02b338b1d8be 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -10677,7 +10677,7 @@ int intel_plane_atomic_calc_changes(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_stat
>   	 * the w/a on all three platforms.
>   	 */
>   	if (plane->id == PLANE_SPRITE0 &&
> -	    (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 5) || IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6) ||
> +	    (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 5, 6) ||
>   	     IS_IVYBRIDGE(dev_priv)) &&
>   	    (turn_on || (!needs_scaling(old_plane_state) &&
>   			 needs_scaling(to_intel_plane_state(plane_state)))))
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> index 7642f6634f7b..779c683b48ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> @@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ void intel_engine_init_global_seqno(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, u32 seqno)
>   	 * the semaphore value, then when the seqno moves backwards all
>   	 * future waits will complete instantly (causing rendering corruption).
>   	 */
> -	if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6) || IS_GEN(dev_priv, 7)) {
> +	if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6, 7)) {
>   		I915_WRITE(RING_SYNC_0(engine->mmio_base), 0);
>   		I915_WRITE(RING_SYNC_1(engine->mmio_base), 0);
>   		if (HAS_VEBOX(dev_priv))
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c
> index ff2743ccbece..a16b463a527d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c
> @@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ static bool __intel_set_cpu_fifo_underrun_reporting(struct drm_device *dev,
>   
>   	if (HAS_GMCH_DISPLAY(dev_priv))
>   		i9xx_set_fifo_underrun_reporting(dev, pipe, enable, old);
> -	else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 5) || IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6))
> +	else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 5, 6))
>   		ironlake_set_fifo_underrun_reporting(dev, pipe, enable);
>   	else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 7))
>   		ivybridge_set_fifo_underrun_reporting(dev, pipe, enable, old);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pipe_crc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pipe_crc.c
> index 9e870caf8104..3e06570337b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pipe_crc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pipe_crc.c
> @@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ static int get_new_crc_ctl_reg(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>   		return i9xx_pipe_crc_ctl_reg(dev_priv, pipe, source, val);
>   	else if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
>   		return vlv_pipe_crc_ctl_reg(dev_priv, pipe, source, val);
> -	else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 5) || IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6))
> +	else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 5, 6))
>   		return ilk_pipe_crc_ctl_reg(source, val);
>   	else
>   		return ivb_pipe_crc_ctl_reg(dev_priv, pipe, source, val, set_wa);
> @@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ intel_is_valid_crc_source(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>   		return i9xx_crc_source_valid(dev_priv, source);
>   	else if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
>   		return vlv_crc_source_valid(dev_priv, source);
> -	else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 5) || IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6))
> +	else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 5, 6))
>   		return ilk_crc_source_valid(dev_priv, source);
>   	else
>   		return ivb_crc_source_valid(dev_priv, source);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> index c36453d66d93..88cbd32d6964 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> @@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ check_for_unclaimed_mmio(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>   	if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
>   		ret |= vlv_check_for_unclaimed_mmio(dev_priv);
>   
> -	if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6) || IS_GEN(dev_priv, 7))
> +	if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6, 7))
>   		ret |= gen6_check_for_fifo_debug(dev_priv);
>   
>   	return ret;
> @@ -556,7 +556,7 @@ static void __intel_uncore_early_sanitize(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>   		dev_priv->uncore.funcs.force_wake_get(dev_priv,
>   						      restore_forcewake);
>   
> -		if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6) || IS_GEN(dev_priv, 7))
> +		if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6, 7))
>   			dev_priv->uncore.fifo_count =
>   				fifo_free_entries(dev_priv);
>   		spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
> @@ -1437,7 +1437,7 @@ static void intel_uncore_fw_domains_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>   				       FORCEWAKE_MEDIA_VEBOX_GEN11(i),
>   				       FORCEWAKE_ACK_MEDIA_VEBOX_GEN11(i));
>   		}
> -	} else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 10) || IS_GEN(dev_priv, 9)) {
> +	} else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 9, 10)) {
>   		dev_priv->uncore.funcs.force_wake_get =
>   			fw_domains_get_with_fallback;
>   		dev_priv->uncore.funcs.force_wake_put = fw_domains_put;
> 


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list