[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: merge gen checks to use range
Rodrigo Vivi
rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Fri Nov 2 22:12:18 UTC 2018
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 12:47:28PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 12:19:13PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 11:10:10AM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 11:31:25AM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 01/11/2018 08:35, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> > > > > Instead of using several IS_GEN(), it's possible to pass the
> > > > > range as argument. By code inspection these were the ranges deemed
> > > > > necessary for spatch:
> > > > >
> > > > > @@
> > > > > expression e;
> > > > > @@
> > > > > (
> > > > > - IS_GEN(e, 3) || IS_GEN(e, 4)
> > > > > + IS_GEN(e, 3, 4)
> > > > > |
> > > > > - IS_GEN(e, 5) || IS_GEN(e, 6)
> > > > > + IS_GEN(e, 5, 6)
> > > > > |
> > > > > - IS_GEN(e, 6) || IS_GEN(e, 7)
> > > > > + IS_GEN(e, 6, 7)
> > > > > |
> > > > > - IS_GEN(e, 7) || IS_GEN(e, 8)
> > > > > + IS_GEN(e, 7, 8)
> > > > > |
> > > > > - IS_GEN(e, 8) || IS_GEN(e, 9)
> > > > > + IS_GEN(e, 8, 9)
> > > > > |
> > > > > - IS_GEN(e, 10) || IS_GEN(e, 9)
> > > > > + IS_GEN(e, 9, 10)
> > > > > |
> > > > > - IS_GEN(e, 9) || IS_GEN(e, 10)
> > > > > + IS_GEN(e, 9, 10)
> > > > > )
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 6 +++---
> > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 2 +-
> > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 2 +-
> > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c | 2 +-
> > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c | 2 +-
> > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 +-
> > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c | 2 +-
> > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c | 2 +-
> > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pipe_crc.c | 4 ++--
> > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 6 +++---
> > > > > 10 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > > > > index 28d95f9d0b0e..f2fbc016bd7f 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > > > > @@ -2030,7 +2030,7 @@ static int i915_swizzle_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> > > > > seq_printf(m, "bit6 swizzle for Y-tiling = %s\n",
> > > > > swizzle_string(dev_priv->mm.bit_6_swizzle_y));
> > > > > - if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 3) || IS_GEN(dev_priv, 4)) {
> > > > > + if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 3, 4)) {
> > > >
> > > > I can see value in it but think it would read better with IS_GEN_RANGE.
> > >
> > > Ok, it seems there's a rough consensus of s/IS_GEN/IS_GEN_RANGE/ an then
> > > bring the patches that make sense here. There was a recent patch from Rodrigo
> > > doing that. I'll include it in next version.
> >
> > I liked the double args idea but after reading I believe
> > it gets clear IS_GEN_RANGE.
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Are there any cases of or-ed IS_GEN checks with something sandwiched in
> > > > between then, which the above spatch would miss?
> > >
> > > By manually inspecting the result of ``git grep -ne "IS_GEN(.*" -- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/``
> > > I didn't find any. The only thing I found was a missed case for gen3 || gen2
> > > that was not covered by the spatch.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > How many non-consecutive IS_GEN gen checks are there? To give us some ideas
> > > > if the usual pattern is range, or perhaps checks against a list of gens also
> > > > exists? (Gut feeling says no.)
> > >
> > > only cases of <=, <, >=, >.
> >
> > For these cases on patches 4 and 5::
> >
> > What about converting all < n to <= n-1 and all > n to >= n + 1
> > get FORVER back and introduce IS_GEN_UNTIL ?
> >
> > IS_GEN_UNTIL(dev_priv, e)
> > IS_GEN_RANGE(dev_priv, s, FOREVER)
> >
> > so we can also kill INTEL_GEN.
> >
> > Another different idea on top of that.
> >
> > What about removing all "IS_"?
> >
> > so end result could be something like that:
> >
> > INTEL_GEN(dev_priv, n)
> > DISPLAY_GEN(dev_priv, n)
> > INTEL_GEN_RANGE(dev_priv, s, e) #or e = FOREVER
> > DISPLAY_GEN_RANGE(dev_priv, s, e) #or e = FOREVER
> > INTEL_GEN_UNTIL(dev_priv, e)
> > DISPLAY_GEN_UNTIL(dev_priv, e)
> >
> > (maybe s/INTEL/GT)
>
> I like it. I'm just not sure about UNTIL, because I will always have doubts if
> it's inclusive or not. But I guess we have the same today with RANGE and we
> just get used to it. By making all of them inclusive, it will be easier.
>
> Anyway, my preference is:
>
> GT_GEN(dev_priv, n)
> GT_GEN_RANGE(dev_priv, s, e)
> and e can be GEN_FOREVER, aka -1. The macro has enough knowledge to work out
one niptik
I prefer FOREVER alone than GEN_FOREVER because macro already has "GEN"
> the mask, e.g. s == 10, e == FOREVER => mask == ~(BIT(s) | (BIT(s) - 1))
>
> And the DISPLAY_GEN* counterparts.
>
> IMO there's no need to have _UNTIL because it can also be expressed as
> GT_GEN_RANGE(dev_priv, GEN_FOREVER, 10).
Yeap, the GEN_FOREVER I had just killed last week covered this case,
but my brain refuses to use and accept FOREVER to something in the past.
maybe GT_GEN_RANGE(dev_priv, 0, 10) instead of UNTIL ?
or GT_GEN_RANGE(dev_priv, BEGIN, 10) ?
>
> This way we can also kill the comparisons INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) == x, so we always
> work with the gen_mask field. Which means the compiler can do a single comparison
> (/me hoping it actually generates good code)
yeap!
>
> There are corner cases though:
>
> What should we do with e.g. IS_GEN9_LP() and friends?
#define GT_GEN_LP(dev_priv, n) GT_GEN(dev_priv, n) && IS_LP(dev_priv)
#define DISPLAY_GEN_LP(dev_priv, n) DISPLAY_GEN(dev_priv, n) && IS_LP(dev_priv)
#define GT_GEN_BC(dev_priv, n) GT_GEN(dev_priv, n) && !IS_LP(dev_priv)
#define DISPLAY_GEN_BC(dev_priv, n) DISPLAY_GEN(dev_priv, n) && !IS_LP(dev_priv)
I think this would be useful to replace many IS_VALLEYVIEW || IS_CHERRYVIEW
to DISPLAY_GEN_LP(dev_priv, 7)
either this above or simply kill it in favor of a more verbose version everywhere
GT_GEN(dev_priv, 9) && IS_LP(dev_priv) ?! :/
>
>
> Any conversion like these will create a lot of noise, not only for inflight patches,
> but also for stable backports. So IMO anything we do needs to be scriptable.
I fully agree.
Thanks,
Rodrigo.
>
> Lucas De Marchi
>
> >
> > and group all of these together, because today
> > they are spreadded apart.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rodrigo.
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > thanks
> > > Lucas De Marchi
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Tvrtko
> > > >
> > > > > seq_printf(m, "DDC = 0x%08x\n",
> > > > > I915_READ(DCC));
> > > > > seq_printf(m, "DDC2 = 0x%08x\n",
> > > > > @@ -4260,7 +4260,7 @@ i915_cache_sharing_get(void *data, u64 *val)
> > > > > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = data;
> > > > > u32 snpcr;
> > > > > - if (!(IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6) || IS_GEN(dev_priv, 7)))
> > > > > + if (!(IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6, 7)))
> > > > > return -ENODEV;
> > > > > intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
> > > > > @@ -4280,7 +4280,7 @@ i915_cache_sharing_set(void *data, u64 val)
> > > > > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = data;
> > > > > u32 snpcr;
> > > > > - if (!(IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6) || IS_GEN(dev_priv, 7)))
> > > > > + if (!(IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6, 7)))
> > > > > return -ENODEV;
> > > > > if (val > 3)
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> > > > > index c9f8aa47005a..969691e50c04 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> > > > > @@ -1673,7 +1673,7 @@ static void capture_reg_state(struct i915_gpu_state *error)
> > > > > error->ccid = I915_READ(CCID);
> > > > > /* 3: Feature specific registers */
> > > > > - if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6) || IS_GEN(dev_priv, 7)) {
> > > > > + if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6, 7)) {
> > > > > error->gam_ecochk = I915_READ(GAM_ECOCHK);
> > > > > error->gac_eco = I915_READ(GAC_ECO_BITS);
> > > > > }
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> > > > > index 92daddf79cb0..baaa7b70ffa0 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> > > > > @@ -3449,7 +3449,7 @@ void i915_perf_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > > > > dev_priv->perf.oa.ops.read = gen8_oa_read;
> > > > > dev_priv->perf.oa.ops.oa_hw_tail_read = gen8_oa_hw_tail_read;
> > > > > - if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 8) || IS_GEN(dev_priv, 9)) {
> > > > > + if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 8, 9)) {
> > > > > dev_priv->perf.oa.ops.is_valid_b_counter_reg =
> > > > > gen7_is_valid_b_counter_addr;
> > > > > dev_priv->perf.oa.ops.is_valid_mux_reg =
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c
> > > > > index bf4fd739b68c..1822dccb1914 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c
> > > > > @@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ intel_crt_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *connector,
> > > > > * DAC limit supposedly 355 MHz.
> > > > > */
> > > > > max_clock = 270000;
> > > > > - else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 3) || IS_GEN(dev_priv, 4))
> > > > > + else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 3, 4))
> > > > > max_clock = 400000;
> > > > > else
> > > > > max_clock = 350000;
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> > > > > index 873f37b7b796..a1b046c322d5 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> > > > > @@ -783,7 +783,7 @@ void intel_device_info_runtime_init(struct intel_device_info *info)
> > > > > DRM_INFO("Display disabled (module parameter)\n");
> > > > > info->num_pipes = 0;
> > > > > } else if (info->num_pipes > 0 &&
> > > > > - (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 7) || IS_GEN(dev_priv, 8)) &&
> > > > > + (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 7, 8)) &&
> > > > > HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv)) {
> > > > > u32 fuse_strap = I915_READ(FUSE_STRAP);
> > > > > u32 sfuse_strap = I915_READ(SFUSE_STRAP);
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > > > index 84c432cbdf5b..02b338b1d8be 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > > > @@ -10677,7 +10677,7 @@ int intel_plane_atomic_calc_changes(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_stat
> > > > > * the w/a on all three platforms.
> > > > > */
> > > > > if (plane->id == PLANE_SPRITE0 &&
> > > > > - (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 5) || IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6) ||
> > > > > + (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 5, 6) ||
> > > > > IS_IVYBRIDGE(dev_priv)) &&
> > > > > (turn_on || (!needs_scaling(old_plane_state) &&
> > > > > needs_scaling(to_intel_plane_state(plane_state)))))
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> > > > > index 7642f6634f7b..779c683b48ab 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> > > > > @@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ void intel_engine_init_global_seqno(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, u32 seqno)
> > > > > * the semaphore value, then when the seqno moves backwards all
> > > > > * future waits will complete instantly (causing rendering corruption).
> > > > > */
> > > > > - if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6) || IS_GEN(dev_priv, 7)) {
> > > > > + if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6, 7)) {
> > > > > I915_WRITE(RING_SYNC_0(engine->mmio_base), 0);
> > > > > I915_WRITE(RING_SYNC_1(engine->mmio_base), 0);
> > > > > if (HAS_VEBOX(dev_priv))
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c
> > > > > index ff2743ccbece..a16b463a527d 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c
> > > > > @@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ static bool __intel_set_cpu_fifo_underrun_reporting(struct drm_device *dev,
> > > > > if (HAS_GMCH_DISPLAY(dev_priv))
> > > > > i9xx_set_fifo_underrun_reporting(dev, pipe, enable, old);
> > > > > - else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 5) || IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6))
> > > > > + else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 5, 6))
> > > > > ironlake_set_fifo_underrun_reporting(dev, pipe, enable);
> > > > > else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 7))
> > > > > ivybridge_set_fifo_underrun_reporting(dev, pipe, enable, old);
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pipe_crc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pipe_crc.c
> > > > > index 9e870caf8104..3e06570337b6 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pipe_crc.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pipe_crc.c
> > > > > @@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ static int get_new_crc_ctl_reg(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > > > > return i9xx_pipe_crc_ctl_reg(dev_priv, pipe, source, val);
> > > > > else if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
> > > > > return vlv_pipe_crc_ctl_reg(dev_priv, pipe, source, val);
> > > > > - else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 5) || IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6))
> > > > > + else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 5, 6))
> > > > > return ilk_pipe_crc_ctl_reg(source, val);
> > > > > else
> > > > > return ivb_pipe_crc_ctl_reg(dev_priv, pipe, source, val, set_wa);
> > > > > @@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ intel_is_valid_crc_source(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > > > > return i9xx_crc_source_valid(dev_priv, source);
> > > > > else if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
> > > > > return vlv_crc_source_valid(dev_priv, source);
> > > > > - else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 5) || IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6))
> > > > > + else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 5, 6))
> > > > > return ilk_crc_source_valid(dev_priv, source);
> > > > > else
> > > > > return ivb_crc_source_valid(dev_priv, source);
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> > > > > index c36453d66d93..88cbd32d6964 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> > > > > @@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ check_for_unclaimed_mmio(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > > > > if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
> > > > > ret |= vlv_check_for_unclaimed_mmio(dev_priv);
> > > > > - if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6) || IS_GEN(dev_priv, 7))
> > > > > + if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6, 7))
> > > > > ret |= gen6_check_for_fifo_debug(dev_priv);
> > > > > return ret;
> > > > > @@ -556,7 +556,7 @@ static void __intel_uncore_early_sanitize(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > > > > dev_priv->uncore.funcs.force_wake_get(dev_priv,
> > > > > restore_forcewake);
> > > > > - if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6) || IS_GEN(dev_priv, 7))
> > > > > + if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6, 7))
> > > > > dev_priv->uncore.fifo_count =
> > > > > fifo_free_entries(dev_priv);
> > > > > spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
> > > > > @@ -1437,7 +1437,7 @@ static void intel_uncore_fw_domains_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > > > > FORCEWAKE_MEDIA_VEBOX_GEN11(i),
> > > > > FORCEWAKE_ACK_MEDIA_VEBOX_GEN11(i));
> > > > > }
> > > > > - } else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 10) || IS_GEN(dev_priv, 9)) {
> > > > > + } else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 9, 10)) {
> > > > > dev_priv->uncore.funcs.force_wake_get =
> > > > > fw_domains_get_with_fallback;
> > > > > dev_priv->uncore.funcs.force_wake_put = fw_domains_put;
> > > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > > > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list