[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/14] drm/i915: Remove some useless zeroing on skl+ wm calculations

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 02:11:10PM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 05:06:03PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > We memset(0) the entire watermark struct the start, so there's no
> > need to clear things later on.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 20 +++++---------------
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > index bd5f16bc7e08..b0720994fa0a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > @@ -4706,10 +4706,8 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  	if (latency == 0)
> >  		return level == 0 ? -EINVAL : 0;
> >  
> > -	if (!intel_wm_plane_visible(cstate, intel_pstate)) {
> > -		result->plane_en = false;
> > +	if (!intel_wm_plane_visible(cstate, intel_pstate))
> >  		return 0;
> > -	}
> >  
> >  	/* Display WA #1141: kbl,cfl */
> >  	if ((IS_KABYLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_COFFEELAKE(dev_priv) ||
> > @@ -4806,8 +4804,6 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  	if ((level > 0 && res_lines > 31) ||
> >  	    res_blocks >= ddb_allocation ||
> >  	    min_disp_buf_needed >= ddb_allocation) {
> > -		result->plane_en = false;
> > -
> >  		/*
> >  		 * If there are no valid level 0 watermarks, then we can't
> >  		 * support this display configuration.
> > @@ -4831,10 +4827,8 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  	 */
> >  	if (wp->is_planar && level >= 1 &&
> >  	    (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_BROXTON(dev_priv) ||
> > -	     IS_CNL_REVID(dev_priv, CNL_REVID_A0, CNL_REVID_A0))) {
> > -		result->plane_en = false;
> > +	     IS_CNL_REVID(dev_priv, CNL_REVID_A0, CNL_REVID_A0)))
> 
> this reminds me that I probably forgot one patch behind somewhere...

Nah. You just reviewed the old version here :)

> 
> 
> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> 
> 
> >  		return 0;
> > -	}
> >  
> >  	/* The number of lines are ignored for the level 0 watermark. */
> >  	result->plane_res_b = res_blocks;
> > @@ -4920,15 +4914,15 @@ static void skl_compute_transition_wm(const struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
> >  	uint16_t wm0_sel_res_b, trans_offset_b, res_blocks;
> >  
> >  	if (!cstate->base.active)
> > -		goto exit;
> > +		return;
> >  
> >  	/* Transition WM are not recommended by HW team for GEN9 */
> >  	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) <= 9)
> > -		goto exit;
> > +		return;
> >  
> >  	/* Transition WM don't make any sense if ipc is disabled */
> >  	if (!dev_priv->ipc_enabled)
> > -		goto exit;
> > +		return;
> >  
> >  	trans_min = 14;
> >  	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11)
> > @@ -4967,11 +4961,7 @@ static void skl_compute_transition_wm(const struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
> >  	if (res_blocks < ddb_allocation) {
> >  		trans_wm->plane_res_b = res_blocks;
> >  		trans_wm->plane_en = true;
> > -		return;
> >  	}
> > -
> > -exit:
> > -	trans_wm->plane_en = false;
> >  }
> >  
> >  static int __skl_build_plane_wm_single(struct skl_ddb_allocation *ddb,
> > -- 
> > 2.18.1
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel