[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 3/5] drm/dp_mst: Check payload count in drm_dp_mst_atomic_check()

[Lyude Paul]

It occurred to me that we never actually check this! So let's start
doing that.

Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
index 42443275624b..89a6d48314ef 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
@@ -3222,7 +3222,7 @@ drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_topology_state(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
 {
 	struct drm_dp_vcpi_allocation *vcpi;
 	struct drm_dp_mst_port *port;
-	int avail_slots = 63, ret;
+	int avail_slots = 63, payload_count = 0, ret;
 
 	/* There's no possible scenario where releasing VCPI or keeping it the
 	 * same would make the state invalid
@@ -3260,6 +3260,13 @@ drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_topology_state(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
 			goto port_fail;
 		}
 
+		if (++payload_count > mgr->max_payloads) {
+			DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("[MST MGR:%p] state %p has too many payloads (max=%d)\n",
+					 mgr, mst_state, mgr->max_payloads);
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+			goto port_fail;
+		}
+
 		drm_dp_put_port(port);
 	}
 	DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("[MST MGR:%p] mst state %p VCPI avail=%d used=%d\n",
-- 
2.19.1