[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/icl: replace check for combo phy

[Imre Deak]

On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 03:34:39PM -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> These are the only places that assume ports A and B are the ones with
> combo phy.  Let's use intel_port_is_combophy() there to make sure
> it check for combo phy ports the same way everywhere.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_combo_phy.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_combo_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_combo_phy.c
> index f7c16f6724f0..2bc0200806ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_combo_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_combo_phy.c
> @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ void icl_combo_phys_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
>  	enum port port;
>  
> -	for (port = PORT_A; port <= PORT_B; port++) {
> +	for (port = PORT_A; intel_port_is_combophy(dev_priv, port); port++) {
>  		u32 val;
>  
>  		if (icl_combo_phy_verify_state(dev_priv, port)) {
> @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ void icl_combo_phys_uninit(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
>  	enum port port;
>  
> -	for (port = PORT_A; port <= PORT_B; port++) {
> +	for (port = PORT_A; intel_port_is_combophy(dev_priv, port); port++) {

Would be better to reverse at one point the uninit order as Jose
noticed, so could we have a for_each_combophy_port /
for_each_combophy_port_rev instead?

>  		u32 val;
>  
>  		if (!icl_combo_phy_verify_state(dev_priv, port))
> -- 
> 2.19.1.1.g56c4683e68
>