[Intel-gfx] [CI 1/2] drm/i915/skl: Rework MOCS tables to keep common part in a define

[Chris Wilson]

Quoting Lucas De Marchi (2018-11-30 23:19:18)
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 09:59:53PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Lucas De Marchi (2018-11-30 21:33:03)
> > > From: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis at intel.com>
> > > 
> > > The MOCS tables are going to be very similar across platforms.
> > > 
> > > To reduce the amount of copied code, this patch rips the common part and
> > > puts it into a definition valid for all gen9 platforms.
> > > 
> > > v2: Made defines for or-ing flags. Renamed macros from MOCS_TABLE
> > >     to MOCS_ENTRIES. (Joonas)
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis at intel.com>
> > > Suggested-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com> (v1)
> > 
> > Lucas, this needs your s-o-b if you are sending it for inclusion (to
> > state that you do have the legal authority to do so).
> 
> Did I misunderstand the meaning of the CI tag? These are exactly the
> same commits as https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/51258/
> I'm only sending again to get them to run properly on CI since patchwork
> got confused with the in-reply-to used there.
> 
> And I'm not going to apply these myself, so adding the s-o-b didn't seem
> appropriate.

If you ask someone else to apply this series as is, it has passed
through your hands and you need to affirm that you do have authority to
be supplying these patches.

I may have misunderstood your intent (if the commits remained the same
as before, you could have just requeued the earlier series for testing)
as I thought your intent here was to get CI results before applying
these patches (be that yourself or by proxy).
-Chris