[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Show actual along side request frequency in debugfs/i915_rps_boost_info
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Tue Oct 2 11:02:26 UTC 2018
On 02/10/2018 09:36, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Previously we hesitated in adding the hw probe for the actual GPU
> frequency for rps_boost as it is quite cumbersome, but given some
> surprising HW behaviour it would be useful to know both the RPS boost
> state and the actual HW state in one location.
>
> Reported-by: Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarvela at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index b4744a68cd88..ce17a53b3a66 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -2215,8 +2215,22 @@ static int i915_rps_boost_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = node_to_i915(m->private);
> struct drm_device *dev = &dev_priv->drm;
> struct intel_rps *rps = &dev_priv->gt_pm.rps;
> + u32 act_freq = rps->cur_freq;
> struct drm_file *file;
>
> + if (intel_runtime_pm_get_if_in_use(dev_priv)) {
> + if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv)) {
> + mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
> + act_freq = vlv_punit_read(dev_priv,
> + PUNIT_REG_GPU_FREQ_STS);
There is another read site for this reg which right shifts and masks
before passing to intel_gpu_freq. Who is right and who is wrong? :)
Regards,
Tvrtko`
> + mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
> + } else {
> + act_freq = intel_get_cagf(dev_priv,
> + I915_READ(GEN6_RPSTAT1));
> + }
> + intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
> + }
> +
> seq_printf(m, "RPS enabled? %d\n", rps->enabled);
> seq_printf(m, "GPU busy? %s [%d requests]\n",
> yesno(dev_priv->gt.awake), dev_priv->gt.active_requests);
> @@ -2224,8 +2238,9 @@ static int i915_rps_boost_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> seq_printf(m, "Boosts outstanding? %d\n",
> atomic_read(&rps->num_waiters));
> seq_printf(m, "Interactive? %d\n", READ_ONCE(rps->power.interactive));
> - seq_printf(m, "Frequency requested %d\n",
> - intel_gpu_freq(dev_priv, rps->cur_freq));
> + seq_printf(m, "Frequency requested %d, actual %d\n",
> + intel_gpu_freq(dev_priv, rps->cur_freq),
> + intel_gpu_freq(dev_priv, act_freq));
> seq_printf(m, " min hard:%d, soft:%d; max soft:%d, hard:%d\n",
> intel_gpu_freq(dev_priv, rps->min_freq),
> intel_gpu_freq(dev_priv, rps->min_freq_softlimit),
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list