[Intel-gfx] [FOR CI 05/22] drm/vmwgfx: Remove confused comment from vmw_du_connector_atomic_set_property
Daniel Vetter
daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch
Fri Oct 5 08:11:35 UTC 2018
The core _does_ the call to drm_atomic_commit for you. That's pretty
much the entire point of having the fancy new atomic_set/get_prop
callbacks.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
Cc: VMware Graphics <linux-graphics-maintainer at vmware.com>
Cc: Sinclair Yeh <syeh at vmware.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom at vmware.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c
index 91ad45b22fee..a50fb0360317 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c
@@ -2303,12 +2303,6 @@ vmw_du_connector_atomic_set_property(struct drm_connector *connector,
if (property == dev_priv->implicit_placement_property) {
vcs->is_implicit = val;
-
- /*
- * We should really be doing a drm_atomic_commit() to
- * commit the new state, but since this doesn't cause
- * an immedate state change, this is probably ok
- */
du->is_implicit = vcs->is_implicit;
} else {
return -EINVAL;
--
2.19.0.rc2
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list