[Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_set_tiling_vs_pwrite: Skip on unknown swizzling

[Tvrtko Ursulin]

On 11/10/2018 13:49, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-10-11 13:42:31)
>>
>> On 11/10/2018 13:34, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>> Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-10-11 13:30:27)
>>>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
>>>>
>>>> Same as in commit 78071c2fa53d ("igt/gem_tiled_partial_pwrite_pread: Check
>>>> for known swizzling"), to be able to compare the bo against the test
>>>> pattern we need to skip the test if the swizzling is not compatible.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
>>>> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102575
>>>> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
>>>> ---
>>>> Eeek confidence level low - is this correct?
>>>
>>> Actually this is a slightly more subtle problem,
>>> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/240327/
>>
>> So assuming your patch is in, this IGT cannot actually work if any
>> swizzling is in effect?
> 
> With the kernel patch, pwrite is a pure linear write to physical
> address, not guaranteeing layout on the gpu (the gpu sees it through the
> tile + swizzle combo). So set-tiling no longer affects pwrite and the
> test should see identical in/out.

Yes of course..

>> Or without your patch, it should skip based on
>> known_swizzling? Or is even that not enough?
> 
> Without the patch, we would need to take swizzling into account and so
> skip as we cannot know the swizzling in this case. The test illustrates
> that currently we do the swizzling asymmetrically, our API is bust. The
> test further illustrates that at times we cannot even know when swizzling
> is required (due to L-shape eccentricities and the swizzling changing
> within an object) and so the concept of handling swizzling on the API
> boundary on behalf of the user is unworkable.

Sounds believable to me. So I am happy to review that patch on the 
technical level, just ask you to gather some more acks. Sounds like a plan?

Is there any risk that there were no bug reports due the affected 
platform being old?

Regards,

Tvrtko