[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 6/6] drm/i915: Check PSR errors instead of retrain while PSR is enabled
Dhinakaran Pandiyan
dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com
Fri Oct 19 21:02:04 UTC 2018
On Wed, 2018-10-10 at 17:41 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> When a PSR error happens sink also update the link status values
> while source do not retrain link as required in the PSR exit
> sequence.
> So in the short pulse handling it was returning earlier and doing a
> full detection and attempting to retrain but it fails because for
> most sinks the main link is disabled while PSR is active, before even
> check PSR errors.
>
> Just call intel_psr_short_pulse() before
> intel_dp_needs_link_retrain() is also not the right fix as
> intel_dp_needs_link_retrain() would return true and trigger a full
> detection and trying to retrain link while PSR HW is also doing that.
>
> Check for PSR active is also not safe as it could be inactive due a
> frontbuffer invalidate and still doing the PSR exit sequence.
>
> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 7 +++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index 1826d491efd7..2a21a9e29eb2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -4396,6 +4396,13 @@ intel_dp_needs_link_retrain(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp)
> if (!intel_dp->link_trained)
> return false;
>
> + /*
> + * While PSR is enabled, HW will control main-link and retrain
> when
> + * exiting PSR
> + */
> + if (intel_psr_enabled(intel_dp))
You need a check for !link_standby. The link status is expected to be
good if we are not turning the link fully off.
-DK
> + return false;
> +
> if (!intel_dp_get_link_status(intel_dp, link_status))
> return false;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index 3dea7a1bda7f..147a116cfc71 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -1958,6 +1958,7 @@ void intel_psr_irq_handler(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 psr_iir);
> void intel_psr_short_pulse(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> int intel_psr_wait_for_idle(const struct intel_crtc_state
> *new_crtc_state,
> u32 *out_value);
> +bool intel_psr_enabled(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>
> /* intel_runtime_pm.c */
> int intel_power_domains_init(struct drm_i915_private *);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> index ad09130cb4ad..e4429f2f3034 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> @@ -1138,3 +1138,18 @@ void intel_psr_short_pulse(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp)
> exit:
> mutex_unlock(&psr->lock);
> }
> +
> +bool intel_psr_enabled(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> + bool ret;
> +
> + if (!CAN_PSR(dev_priv) || !intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp))
> + return false;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
> + ret = (dev_priv->psr.dp == intel_dp && dev_priv->psr.enabled);
> + mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list