[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/icl: Enable DC9 as lowest possible state during screen-off
James Ausmus
james.ausmus at intel.com
Tue Oct 23 20:01:11 UTC 2018
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:52:31AM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:32:21AM -0700, Anusha Srivatsa wrote:
> > From: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna at intel.com>
> >
> > ICL supports DC5, DC6, and DC9. Enable DC9 during screen-off, and enable
> > DC5/6 when appropriate.
> >
> > v2: (James Ausmus)
> > - Also handle ICL as GEN9_LP in i915_drm_suspend_late and
> > i915_drm_suspend_early
> > - Add DC9 to gen9_dc_mask for ICL
> > - Re-order GEN checks for newest platform first
> > - Use INTEL_GEN instead of INTEL_INFO->gen
> > - Use INTEL_GEN >= 11 instead of IS_ICELAKE
> > - Consolidate GEN checks
> >
> > v3: (James Ausmus)
> > - Also allow DC6 for ICL (Imre, Art)
> > - Simplify !(GEN >= 11) to GEN < 11 (Imre)
> >
> > v4: (James Ausmus)
> > - Don't call intel_power_sequencer_reset after DC9 for Gen11+, as the
> > PPS regs are Always On
> > - Rebase against upstream changes
> >
> > v5: (Anusha Srivatsa)
> > - rebased against the latest upstream changes.
> >
> > v6: (Anusha Srivatsa)
> > - rebased.Use INTEL_GEN consistently.
> > - Simplify the code (Rodrigo)
> >
> > v7: rebased. Change order according to platforms(Jyoti)
> >
> > Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: James Ausmus <james.ausmus at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa at intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 20 +++++++++++++++---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 3 +++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 27 +++++++++++++++----------
> > 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > index baac35f698f9..6691b9ee95db 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > @@ -2156,7 +2156,7 @@ static int i915_drm_resume_early(struct drm_device *dev)
> >
> > intel_uncore_resume_early(dev_priv);
> >
> > - if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv)) {
> > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11 || IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv)) {
> > gen9_sanitize_dc_state(dev_priv);
> > bxt_disable_dc9(dev_priv);
> > } else if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) || IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv)) {
> > @@ -2923,7 +2923,10 @@ static int intel_runtime_suspend(struct device *kdev)
> > intel_uncore_suspend(dev_priv);
> >
> > ret = 0;
> > - if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv)) {
> > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11) {
> > + icl_display_core_uninit(dev_priv);
> > + bxt_enable_dc9(dev_priv);
> > + } else if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv)) {
> > bxt_display_core_uninit(dev_priv);
> > bxt_enable_dc9(dev_priv);
> > } else if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) || IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv)) {
> > @@ -3008,7 +3011,18 @@ static int intel_runtime_resume(struct device *kdev)
> > if (intel_uncore_unclaimed_mmio(dev_priv))
> > DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Unclaimed access during suspend, bios?\n");
> >
> > - if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv)) {
> > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11) {
> > + bxt_disable_dc9(dev_priv);
> > + icl_display_core_init(dev_priv, true);
> > + if (dev_priv->csr.dmc_payload) {
> > + if (dev_priv->csr.allowed_dc_mask &
> > + DC_STATE_EN_UPTO_DC6)
> > + skl_enable_dc6(dev_priv);
> > + else if (dev_priv->csr.allowed_dc_mask &
> > + DC_STATE_EN_UPTO_DC5)
> > + gen9_enable_dc5(dev_priv);
> > + }
> > + } else if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv)) {
> > bxt_disable_dc9(dev_priv);
> > bxt_display_core_init(dev_priv, true);
> > if (dev_priv->csr.dmc_payload &&
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > index 0e9a926fca04..529ff19a5e48 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > @@ -1640,6 +1640,7 @@ void bxt_enable_dc9(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> > void bxt_disable_dc9(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> > void gen9_enable_dc5(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> > unsigned int skl_cdclk_get_vco(unsigned int freq);
> > +void skl_enable_dc6(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> > void intel_dp_get_m_n(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> > struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config);
> > void intel_dp_set_m_n(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> > @@ -1989,6 +1990,8 @@ int intel_power_domains_init(struct drm_i915_private *);
> > void intel_power_domains_cleanup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> > void intel_power_domains_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, bool resume);
> > void intel_power_domains_fini_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> > +void icl_display_core_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, bool resume);
> > +void icl_display_core_uninit(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> > void intel_power_domains_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> > void intel_power_domains_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > index 5f5416eb9644..ef08313cf359 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > @@ -560,7 +560,9 @@ static u32 gen9_dc_mask(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > u32 mask;
> >
> > mask = DC_STATE_EN_UPTO_DC5;
> > - if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv))
> > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11)
> > + mask |= DC_STATE_EN_UPTO_DC6 | DC_STATE_EN_DC9;
> > + else if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv))
> > mask |= DC_STATE_EN_DC9;
> > else
> > mask |= DC_STATE_EN_UPTO_DC6;
> > @@ -633,8 +635,8 @@ void bxt_enable_dc9(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > assert_can_enable_dc9(dev_priv);
> >
> > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Enabling DC9\n");
> > -
> > - intel_power_sequencer_reset(dev_priv);
> > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 11)
> > + intel_power_sequencer_reset(dev_priv);
>
> I'm sorry if this was discussed already, but why is this only
> needed on BXT?
>
> Could we have a comment here or mention on commit message?
It is in the commit message! ;)
<snip>
> > v4: (James Ausmus)
> > - Don't call intel_power_sequencer_reset after DC9 for Gen11+, as the
> > PPS regs are Always On
</snip>
Enough, or need more?
-James
>
> > gen9_set_dc_state(dev_priv, DC_STATE_EN_DC9);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -716,7 +718,7 @@ static void assert_can_enable_dc6(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > assert_csr_loaded(dev_priv);
> > }
> >
> > -static void skl_enable_dc6(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > +void skl_enable_dc6(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > {
> > assert_can_enable_dc6(dev_priv);
> >
> > @@ -2978,17 +2980,20 @@ static uint32_t get_allowed_dc_mask(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > int requested_dc;
> > int max_dc;
> >
> > - if (IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv) || INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->gen >= 10) {
> > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11) {
> > max_dc = 2;
> > - mask = 0;
> > - } else if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv)) {
> > - max_dc = 1;
> > /*
> > * DC9 has a separate HW flow from the rest of the DC states,
> > * not depending on the DMC firmware. It's needed by system
> > * suspend/resume, so allow it unconditionally.
> > */
> > mask = DC_STATE_EN_DC9;
> > + } else if (IS_GEN10(dev_priv) || IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv)) {
> > + max_dc = 2;
> > + mask = 0;
> > + } else if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv)) {
> > + max_dc = 1;
> > + mask = DC_STATE_EN_DC9;
> > } else {
> > max_dc = 0;
> > mask = 0;
> > @@ -3539,8 +3544,8 @@ static void cnl_display_core_uninit(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > I915_WRITE(CHICKEN_MISC_2, val);
> > }
> >
> > -static void icl_display_core_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > - bool resume)
> > +void icl_display_core_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > + bool resume)
> > {
> > struct i915_power_domains *power_domains = &dev_priv->power_domains;
> > struct i915_power_well *well;
> > @@ -3592,7 +3597,7 @@ static void icl_display_core_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > intel_csr_load_program(dev_priv);
> > }
> >
> > -static void icl_display_core_uninit(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > +void icl_display_core_uninit(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > {
> > struct i915_power_domains *power_domains = &dev_priv->power_domains;
> > struct i915_power_well *well;
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list