[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: Enable PSR1 on gen-9+ HW

[Dhinakaran Pandiyan]

On Thu, 2018-09-06 at 22:06 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 04:52:02PM -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> > We have new tests and fixes in place since the feature was last
> > disabled.
> > 
> > Try again for gen-9+ hardware and enable only PSR1 as a first step.
> > 
> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> > Cc: Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
> > Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>
> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > References: commit 2ee7dc497e34 ("drm/i915: disable PSR by default
> > on HSW/BDW")
> > References: commit dcb2e993f3c0 ("Revert "drm/i915: Enable PSR by
> > default on Valleyview and Cherryview."")
> > Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 17 ++++++++---------
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > index b6838b525502..fc823f93a4dc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > @@ -71,6 +71,10 @@ static bool psr_global_enabled(u32 debug)
> >  static bool intel_psr2_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  			       const struct intel_crtc_state
> > *crtc_state)
> >  {
> > +	/* Disable PSR2 by default for all platforms */
> > +	if (i915_modparams.enable_psr == -1)
> > +		return false;
> > +
> >  	switch (dev_priv->psr.debug & I915_PSR_DEBUG_MODE_MASK) {
> >  	case I915_PSR_DEBUG_FORCE_PSR1:
> >  		return false;
> > @@ -1051,7 +1055,7 @@ void intel_psr_flush(struct drm_i915_private
> > *dev_priv,
> >   * intel_psr_init - Init basic PSR work and mutex.
> >   * @dev_priv: i915 device private
> >   *
> > - * This function is  called only once at driver load to initialize
> > basic
> > + * This function is called only once at driver load to initialize
> > basic
> >   * PSR stuff.
> >   */
> >  void intel_psr_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > @@ -1065,19 +1069,14 @@ void intel_psr_init(struct drm_i915_private
> > *dev_priv)
> >  	if (!dev_priv->psr.sink_support)
> >  		return;
> >  
> > -	if (i915_modparams.enable_psr == -1) {
> > -		i915_modparams.enable_psr = dev_priv-
> > >vbt.psr.enable;
> > -
> > -		/* Per platform default: all disabled. */
> > -		i915_modparams.enable_psr = 0;
> > -	}
> > +	if (i915_modparams.enable_psr == -1)
> > +		if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 9 || !dev_priv-
> > >vbt.psr.enable)
> > +			i915_modparams.enable_psr = 0;
> >  
> > -	/* Set link_standby x link_off defaults */
> >  	if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) || IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv))
> >  		/* HSW and BDW require workarounds that we don't
> > implement. */
> >  		dev_priv->psr.link_standby = false;
> >  	else
> > -		/* For new platforms let's respect VBT back again
> > */
> 
> bikeshed: Can we please leave the clean-up for a separated patch?
> In case we need to revert we don't loose the clean-up part! :$
> 
Okay.

> Also a bikeshed of bikeshed: I think we need to revisit this block
> entirely
> anyways. I can't remember why we stopped respecting the bspec here.
> And probably this was only masking some issues that got fixed during
> your great journey! ;)
> 
> Maybe this block even explain the current gap on hsw and bdw?! ;)
The gap is I haven't had time to investigate :)

> 
> >  		dev_priv->psr.link_standby = dev_priv-
> > >vbt.psr.full_link;
> >  
> >  	INIT_WORK(&dev_priv->psr.work, intel_psr_work);
> > -- 
> > 2.17.1
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx