[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v10 0/2] Add XYUV format support

[Lisovskiy, Stanislav]

On Fri, 2018-09-14 at 16:47 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 01:36:32PM +0000, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> > On Fri, 2018-09-07 at 11:45 +0300, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> > > Introduced new XYUV scan-in format for framebuffer and
> > > added support for it to i915(SkyLake+).
> > > 
> > > Stanislav Lisovskiy (2):
> > >   drm: Introduce new DRM_FORMAT_XYUV
> > >   drm/i915: Adding YUV444 packed format support for skl+
> > > 
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fourcc.c         |  1 +
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h      |  2 +-
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c  |  2 ++
> > >  include/uapi/drm/drm_fourcc.h        |  1 +
> > >  5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > 
> > Ping. There is an IGT patch which got Reviewed-by Ville.
> > This one left in order to get XYUV support. 
> 
> Did we figure out userspace for this?
> 
> Was the conflict solved with the other guy (forgot who it is)
> trying to add the same format with a different name?

Currently for userspace we have VLC(checked with Juha-Pekka) and
also IGT test case.

I think those guys were from ARM and they were adding also support for
XYUV. The only difference was that they called XYUV, like XYUV8888
something. 
Our patches were otherwise identical regarding drm_fourcc.c part, I
don't see their stuff merged, but I guess it really shouldn't matter,
who does this first. i915 specific part doesn't conflict with their
stuff. To be honest, I forgot the guy's name neither could find his
email in my mailbox. 
So hopefully somebody shows up here.

> 
-- 
Best Regards,

Lisovskiy Stanislav