[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm: Fix syncobj handing of schedule() returning 0
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Fri Sep 21 09:39:02 UTC 2018
Quoting Daniel Vetter (2018-09-21 10:15:41)
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 11:07:20AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > After schedule() returns 0, we must do one last check of COND to
> > determine the reason for the wakeup with 0 jiffies remaining before
> > reporting the timeout -- otherwise we may lose the signal due to
> > scheduler delays.
>
> Ah classic!
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
Indeed, thanks for the reviews, pushed to drm-misc-next.
-Chris
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list