[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915/psr: Do not enable PSR2 if sink requires selective update X granularity
dhinakaran.pandiyan at gmail.com
dhinakaran.pandiyan at gmail.com
Tue Sep 25 06:23:20 UTC 2018
On Thu, 2018-09-20 at 13:43 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> According to eDP spec, sink could required a granularity in the
> start of x coordinate or in the width of the selective update region.
> As it is not supported by hardware,
I think this warrants an explanation, what is not supported in
hardware? A certain granularity that a specific sink expects?
Even if the sink does not require a specific granularity, the source
has to support the standard granularity values (x%16 = w%4 = y%1 = 0).
Another sink can have these standard values, supported by hardware, as
a requirement and your patch will disable PSR2 on it.
-DK
> lets not enable PSR2 in sinks
> that requires it.
>
> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> index 0dd4211cb293..84b512426514 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> @@ -243,6 +243,8 @@ void intel_psr_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp)
> bool y_req = intel_dp->psr_dpcd[1] &
> DP_PSR2_SU_Y_COORDINATE_REQUIRED;
> bool alpm = intel_dp_get_alpm_status(intel_dp);
> + bool granularity_req = (intel_dp->psr_dpcd[1] &
> + DP_PSR2_SU_GRANULARITY_REQUI
> RED);
>
> /*
> * All panels that supports PSR version 03h (PSR2 +
> @@ -255,7 +257,8 @@ void intel_psr_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp)
> * Y-coordinate requirement panels we would need to
> enable
> * GTC first.
> */
> - dev_priv->psr.sink_psr2_support = y_req && alpm;
> + dev_priv->psr.sink_psr2_support = y_req && alpm &&
> + !granularity_req;
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 %ssupported\n",
> dev_priv->psr.sink_psr2_support ? "" :
> "not ");
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list