[Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] i915/perf_pmu: Idle before measuring idle
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Mon Apr 1 08:15:18 UTC 2019
On 31/03/2019 22:09, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Before trying to measure the busyness reporting for the idle state, make
> sure the gpu is actually idle and not still running any backgound system
> task.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> ---
> tests/perf_pmu.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/perf_pmu.c b/tests/perf_pmu.c
> index 1a08f564b..ef61c4d40 100644
> --- a/tests/perf_pmu.c
> +++ b/tests/perf_pmu.c
> @@ -264,6 +264,7 @@ single(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e, unsigned int flags)
> uint64_t val;
> int fd;
>
> + gem_quiescent_gpu(gem_fd);
> fd = open_pmu(I915_PMU_ENGINE_BUSY(e->class, e->instance));
>
> if (flags & TEST_BUSY)
>
It's okay but where did it fail? Because subtest has quiescent at the
end, and IGT has it at start.
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list