[Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] i915/perf_pmu: Idle before measuring idle

Tvrtko Ursulin tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Mon Apr 1 08:15:18 UTC 2019


On 31/03/2019 22:09, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Before trying to measure the busyness reporting for the idle state, make
> sure the gpu is actually idle and not still running any backgound system
> task.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> ---
>   tests/perf_pmu.c | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/perf_pmu.c b/tests/perf_pmu.c
> index 1a08f564b..ef61c4d40 100644
> --- a/tests/perf_pmu.c
> +++ b/tests/perf_pmu.c
> @@ -264,6 +264,7 @@ single(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e, unsigned int flags)
>   	uint64_t val;
>   	int fd;
>   
> +	gem_quiescent_gpu(gem_fd);
>   	fd = open_pmu(I915_PMU_ENGINE_BUSY(e->class, e->instance));
>   
>   	if (flags & TEST_BUSY)
> 

It's okay but where did it fail? Because subtest has quiescent at the 
end, and IGT has it at start.

Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>

Regards,

Tvrtko


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list