[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: do not mix workaround with normal flow

Lucas De Marchi lucas.demarchi at intel.com
Thu Apr 4 23:04:26 UTC 2019


Separate the two comments: one is a workaround and the other is a sanity
check. We could just compare != 1, but let's treat them differently due
to having different meaning.

Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 25eff3728fcd..b4d1078727dc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -3760,14 +3760,16 @@ bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
 		sagv_block_time_us = 10;
 
 	/*
-	 * SKL+ workaround: bspec recommends we disable SAGV when we have
-	 * more then one pipe enabled
-	 *
 	 * If there are no active CRTCs, no additional checks need be performed
 	 */
 	if (hweight32(intel_state->active_crtcs) == 0)
 		return true;
-	else if (hweight32(intel_state->active_crtcs) > 1)
+
+	/*
+	 * SKL+ workaround: bspec recommends we disable SAGV when we have
+	 * more then one pipe enabled
+	 */
+	if (hweight32(intel_state->active_crtcs) > 1)
 		return false;
 
 	/* Since we're now guaranteed to only have one active CRTC... */
-- 
2.21.0



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list